Skip to main content
. 2019 May 6;40(12):3534–3547. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24614

Table 1.

Results from statistical analysis of Experiment 1

HST—LRT goodness‐of‐fit test
χ2 df p
Time .54 1 .46
Hand Laterality 4.22 1 .04
Hand Size 1,681.82 3 <.001
Time × Hand Size 16.61 3 <.001
Time × Hand Laterality .91 1 .33
Hand Laterality × Hand Size 8.15 3 .04
Time × Hand Laterality × Hand Size 2.53 3 .46
HST—Mixed logistic regression
B SE z value p
Intercept −0.35 .11 −3.06 .002
Time −0.13 .05 −2.57 .01
Hand Laterality −0.04 .05 −0.76 .44
Hand Size (linear trend) −0.11 .006 −16.48 <.001
Hand Size (quadratic trend) −0.004 .0003 −12.48 <.001
Hand Size (cubic trend) .0002 .0001 7.58 <.001
Time × Hand Size (linear trend) −0.02 .008 −3.21 .001
Time × Hand Size (quadratic trend) .0007 .0003 2.08 .03
Time × Hand Size (cubic trend) .0001 .0001 2.34 .01
Hand Laterality × Hand Size (linear trend) .01 .008 1.35 .17
Hand Laterality × Hand Size (quadratic trend) −0.0001 .0003 −0.17 .86
Hand Laterality × Hand Size (cubic trend) −0.0001 .0001 −0.14 .88

Abbreviations: HST, hand size task; LRT, likelihood ratio tests.