Table 2.
Results from statistical analysis of Experiment 2
| HST—LRT goodness‐of‐fit test | ||||
| χ2 | df | p | ||
| Time | 13.45 | 1 | <.001 | |
| Hand Size | 446.62 | 3 | <.001 | |
| Time × Hand Size | 58.92 | 3 | <.001 | |
| FST—LRT goodness‐of‐fit test | ||||
| χ2 | df | p | ||
| Time | .23 | 1 | .62 | |
| Foot Size | 352.57 | 3 | <.001 | |
| Time × Foot Size | 1.51 | 3 | .67 | |
| HST—Mixed logistic regression | ||||
| B | SE | z value | p | |
| Intercept | −0.11 | .14 | −0.75 | .44 |
| Time | −0.30 | .07 | −3.80 | <.001 |
| Hand Size (linear trend) | −0.75 | .09 | −7.91 | <.001 |
| Hand Size (quadratic trend) | −0.16 | .04 | −3.83 | <.001 |
| Hand Size (cubic trend) | .21 | .04 | 4.31 | <.001 |
| Time × Hand Size (linear trend) | −0.33 | .13 | −2.40 | .01 |
| Time × Hand Size (quadratic trend) | .06 | .06 | .98 | .325 |
| Time × Hand Size (cubic trend) | .21 | .03 | 7.19 | <.001 |
| FST—Mixed logistic regression | ||||
| B | SE | z value | p | |
| Intercept | −0.28 | .16 | −1.70 | .08 |
| Foot Size (linear trend) | −0.79 | .06 | −11.38 | <.001 |
| Foot Size (quadratic trend) | −0.07 | .03 | −2.32 | .02 |
| Foot Size (cubic trend) | .16 | .03 | 4.56 | <.001 |
Abbreviations: FST, foot size task; HST, hand size task; LRT, likelihood ratio tests.