Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 17;40(7):2125–2142. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24512

Table 3.

Comparison of BOLD response during right unimanual or bimanual movement preparation in CMM patients and HVs

Contrast/anatomical location MNI coordinates Z score (F score) kE
Effect of Condition
Right precentral 36–22–56 Inf (203.75) 3,714
Right SMA 8–12–52 6.85 (72.36)
Left cerebellum −14–48–22 Inf (137.51) 648
Right thalamus 16–20–8 7.6 (97.56) 259
Right Rolandic operculum 46–18–18 7.48 (92.86) 546
Effect of Group: —
Interaction Group × Condition
Right precentral 36–18–52 4.54 (26.37) 2

CMM = congenital mirror movement; HVs = healthy volunteers; SMA = supplementary motor area. MNI coordinates were derived from a 2 × 2 ANOVA Group (CMM patients; HV) × Condition (unimanual right; bimanual). p < 0.05 corrected at the whole brain level. We then used pairwise t test to compare the activations between CMM patients and HV during the preparation of unimanual and bimanual movements.