Table 5.
Subjects | Sweet | Bitter | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Rho | p | Rho | p | |
1 | −0.03 | .18 | 0.07 | .00 |
2 | 0.02 | .26 | 0.07 | .00 |
3 | 0.18 | <.001 | 0.05 | .01 |
4 | 0.05 | .01 | 0.07 | .00 |
5 | 0.13 | <.001 | 0.10 | <.001 |
6 | 0.03 | .14 | 0.05 | .01 |
7 | 0.03 | .08 | 0.13 | <.001 |
8 | 0.01 | .62 | −0.09 | <.001 |
9 | 0.10 | <.001 | −0.03 | .18 |
10 | 0.17 | <.001 | 0.01 | .55 |
11 | 0.08 | <.001 | −0.02 | .37 |
12 | 0.01 | .63 | 0.35 | <.001 |
13 | 0.09 | <.001 | 0.19 | <.001 |
14 | −0.02 | .30 | 0.02 | .42 |
15 | 0.13 | <.001 | 0.20 | <.001 |
16 | 0.14 | <.001 | 0.13 | <.001 |
17 | 0.18 | <.001 | −0.12 | <.001 |
18 | 0.27 | <.001 | 0.09 | <.001 |
19 | 0.15 | <.001 | 0.11 | <.001 |
20 | 0.17 | <.001 | 0.03 | .08 |
21 | 0.03 | .12 | 0.09 | <.001 |
22 | 0.13 | <.001 | 0.23 | <.001 |
23 | 0.04 | .06 | −0.09 | <.001 |
24 | 0.11 | <.001 | 0.04 | .02 |
25 | 0.08 | <.001 | −0.01 | .43 |
26 | 0.05 | .01 | 0.16 | <.001 |
27 | 0.17 | <.001 | −0.02 | .25 |
28 | 0.04 | .04 | −0.04 | .02 |
29 | 0.13 | <.001 | −0.04 | .06 |
30 | 0.17 | <.001 | 0.27 | <.001 |
31 | 0.12 | <.001 | 0.01 | .55 |
32 | 0.06 | .00 | 0.24 | <.001 |
33 | −0.02 | .42 | −0.13 | <.001 |
34 | 0.15 | <.001 | 0.04 | .05 |
35 | 0.05 | .01 | 0.05 | .01 |
36 | 0.10 | <.001 | −0.02 | .24 |
37 | 0.12 | <.001 | 0.12 | <.001 |
38 | 0.06 | .00 | 0.27 | <.001 |
39 | 0.18 | <.001 | 0.26 | <.001 |
40 | 0.04 | .06 | 0.02 | .41 |
41 | 0.10 | <.001 | 0.16 | <.001 |
42 | 0.10 | <.001 | 0.19 | <.001 |
43 | 0.18 | <.001 | −0.01 | .70 |
44 | 0.14 | <.001 | 0.08 | <.001 |
Note. Spearman spatial correlation between individual and group‐level maps of most responsive concentrations in the left insula for sweet and bitter tastes. The correlation coefficients (rho) and the p values are reported.