Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 12;40(17):4952–4964. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24750

Table 1.

Characteristics of the datasets analyzed within the present study

EORTC‐26101 LPBA40 NFBS CC‐359
Training set Test set
Patients (n) 372 211 40 125 359
MRI exams (n) 1,568 833 40 125 359
MRI exams per patient (median, IQR) 4 (3–6) 4 (3–6) 1 1 1
Institutes (n) 25 12 1 1 2
Patients per institute (median, IQR) 7 (4–15) 11 (3–20) 1 1 60/299
MRI sequence (n)*
T1‐w 1,568 833 40 125 359
cT1‐w 1,623 898
FLAIR 1,940 895
T2‐w 1,455 793
MR vendors (n)
Siemens 535 395 125 120
Philips 350 157 119
General electric 640 267 40 120
Toshiba 12
Unknown 31 14
MR field strength (n)
1.0 T 9 ––
1.5 T 631 78 40 179
3.0 T 216 317 125 180
1.5 or 3 T 619 415
Unknown 104 14

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; LPBA40, LONI Probabilistic Brain Atlas; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NFBS, Nathan Kline Institute Enhanced Rockland Sample Neurofeedback Study; CC‐359, Calgary‐Campinas‐359.

*

higher number of MRI sequences (as compared to total number of MRI exams) due to inclusion of both 2D and 3D acquisition (if available).