Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 22;40(16):4686–4702. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24730

Table 3.

Regional graph topological analyses

ROI Global efficiency Local efficiency Betweenness centrality Cost Average path length Clustering coefficient Degree
L R L R L R L R L R L R L R
Inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis E>H E>H H>E E>H
Middle temporal gyrus, posterior part E>Ha E>Ha H>Ea E>Ha
Inferior temporal gyrus, posterior division E>H E>H H>E E>H
Inferior temporal gyrus, temporo‐occipital part E>H E>H E>H
Postcentral gyrus E>Ha E>Ha
Superior lateral occipital cortex E>H H>Eb E>H
Inferior lateral occipital cortex E>H E>H H>E E>H
Intracalcarine cortex H>E
Frontal medial cortex E>H E>H
Subcallosal cortex E>H E>H
Paracingulate gyrus E>H E>H H>E E>H
Posterior cingulate E>H E>H
Precuneus E>H E>H H>E E>H
Frontal orbital cortex H>E
Parahippocampal gyrus, posterior division E>H E>H E>H E>H
Lingual gyrus E>H E>H E>H H>E E>H E>H
Frontal operculum E>H
Planum polare H>E
Pallidum H>Eb
Hippocampus E>H E>H
Amygdala E>H E>H H>E E>H
Nucleus accumbens E>H E>H E>H E>H
Inferior semilunar lobule, caudal part E>Ha H>Ea E>Ha
Biventral lobule, rostral part H>Eb
Cerebellar tonsil H>Eb
Flocculus E>H E>H
Culmen of vermis E>Ha E>Ha
Tuber of vermis H>E

Note. E is the essential tremor patients and H is the healthy controls.

a

Consistent significance at a threshold of 0.15 and lower.

b

Not significant at lower thresholds.