Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Fam Stud. 2019 Jun 14;28(11):3110–3120. doi: 10.1007/s10826-019-01488-4

Table 3.

Ordinal Logistic Regression of Agency Level Predictors of Caregiver Involvement in Youth Treatment – Unstandardized Coefficients – MLR Estimation

Model 1: Treatment Staffing/Planning Model 2: Choosing Treatment Type or Level of Care Model 3: Fonnal Treatment Sessions

Estimate S.E. Est./S.E. Estimate S.E. Est./S.E. Estimate S.E. Est./S.E.
JDTC 0.457 0.668 0.683 1.238 1.135 1.091 1.932 0.755 2.561**
Reform Efforts 1.321 0.546 2.421* 0.222 0.903 0.246 0.694 0.635 1.093
Training/experience 0.088 0.233 0.379 −1.033 0.384 −2.686** −0.522 0.312 −1.674+
Minority −0.101 0.951 −0.107 0.172 0.588 0.293 −1.902 0.952 −1.998*
FSEI 0.089 0.158 0.560 0.558 0.157 3.560*** 0.361 0.151 2.386*
Rural-Urban 2.145 0.558 3.844*** 0.949 0.279 3.402*** 1.176 0.350 3.357***
Dependent Variable Thresholds
 1 −0.261 0.760 −0.343 −2.126 1.146 −1.855+ −2.915 1.291 −2.257*
 2 1.461 0.562 2.598** −0.819 0.980 −0.835 −0.659 0.862 −0.764
 3 2.646 1.223 2.162* 0.070 0.788 0.089 1.319 1.110 1.189
 4 3.008 1.241 2.425* 1.564 1.006 1.555 3.408 1.528 2.230*

Two-tailed p-values:

+

.10>p>.05;

*

p<.05;

**

p<.01;

***

p<.001.

Variables coding are discussed in the narrative.