Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Head Neck. 2019 Aug 22;41(11):3924–3932. doi: 10.1002/hed.25922

Table 1.

Frequency table, average follow-up time, and average date of functional assessment within the first 90 days after treatment for response categories of the three measures in the PSS-HN assessment in the RTOG 9003 study

Levels of Impairmenta No. of Patients Avg number of PY % of total PY per scale PSS-HN Assessment date (SD)b
Normalcy of Diet (N=650)
 Non-oral feeding Highly impaired 98 3.4 10.9 30.8 (13.2)

 Cold liquids Moderately impaired 27 4.6 4.0 29.1 (13.9)
 Warm liquids “ ” 44 3.6 5.1 30.5 (15.8)
 Pureed foods “ ” 30 4.2 4.1 33.6 (15.2)
 Soft foods requiring no chewing “ ” 86 4.4 12.4 30.9 (15.1)

 Soft chewable foods Modestly impaired 186 5.3 32.0 35.1 (13.6)
 Dry bread and crackers “ ” 34 4.8 5.3 30.3 (15.2)
 Carrots, celery “ ” 10 6.3 2.1 36.7 (19.2)
 All meat “ ” 36 4.9 5.8 39.4 (18.4)
 Peanuts “ ” 4 3.7 0.5 29.3 (8.1)

 Full Diet Not impaired 95 5.7 17.7 35.3 (14.2)
Public Eating (N=633)
 Always eats alone Highly impaired 48 2.2 3.4 32.8 (15.7)

 Eats only at home with select persons Moderately impaired 172 4.2 24.3 30.3 (14.9)
 Eats only in select places “ ” 95 4.5 14.2 33.9 (14.4)

 Eats anywhere, may limit intake Modestly impaired 108 5.7 20.6 33.8 (15.3)
 No restriction of place or food Not impaired 210 5.4 37.4 35.2 (13.8)
Understandability of Speech (N=645)

 Never understandable Highly impaired 12 1.3 0.5 36.5 (24.4)
 Difficult to understand “ ” 14 0.8 0.4 41.4 (15.0)
 Usually understandable, face to face “ ” 34 1.5 1.7 31.2 (17.7)

 Understandable most of the time, some repetition Moderately Impaired 113 3.0 11.4 32.0 (14.2)
 Always understandable Not impaired 472 5.5 86.1 33.3 (14.3)

Abbreviations: RTOG=radiation therapy oncology group, PSS-HN=Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck cancer patients, AVG=average, PY=person-years, SD=standard deviation;

a

The levels correspond to the analytical groups used in proportional hazards modeling. The shading indicates where multiple PSS-HN response categories were grouped for analytical purposes.

b

The average number of days between the end of treatment and the first functional assessment by the PSS-HN.