Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 3;14(1):e12457. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12457

Table 3.

Number of reviews according to criteria of methodological quality

Clearly focused PICO Appropriate inclusion criteria of primary study Comprehensive search strategy Adequate duration of search strategy Level of evidence of included studies clearly illustrated Adequate quality assessment of included studies conducted Quality assessment of included studies transparent Appropriate combining of results across studies Appropriate weighting of results across studies

Author interpretation of results supported by data

Ya Nb Uc Y N U Y N U Y N U Y N U Y N U Y N U Y N U Y N U Y N U
Social and behaviour change interpersonal communication for promoting breastfeeding
10 0 3 9 1 3 4 6 3 10 0 3 10 0 3 3 7 3 2 8 3 10 0 3 7 3 3 7 3 3
Social and behaviour change interpersonal communication for promoting adequate complementary feeding
2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 2
Social and behaviour change mass communication for promoting adequate breastfeeding and complementary feeding
0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1
Provision of complementary food
4 0 2 4 0 2 2 2 2 4 0 2 3 1 2 2 2 3 1 3 2 4 0 2 1 0 2 4 0 2
Home fortification with multiple micronutrient supplementation
1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2
Capacity building
1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Cash transfer and microcredit
0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5
Agricultural or fresh food supply interventions for diet diversification
0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5

Note. PICO = population, intervention, comparison, and outcome.

a

Yes, criteria is present.

b

No, criteria is not present.

c

Unknown: Data not available.