Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 17;14(Suppl 3):e12676. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12676

Table 3.

Associations between SBCC, chicken ownership, and egg consumption

Country Survey round Group / Significance SBCC association with Chicken ownership association with
Women's egg consumption Children's egg consumption Women's egg consumption Children's egg consumption
Burkina Faso 1 With 15% 60% 14% 57%
Without 7% 40% 7% 27%
P (χ 2) 0.059 0.001 0.28 0.001
2 With 60% 86% 37% 81%
Without 40% 66% 25% 66%
P (χ 2) 0.001 0.000 0.123 0.02
3 With 31% 69% 29% 65%
Without 16% 50% 10% 5%
P (χ 2) 0.004 0.001 0.009 0.079
Cote d'Ivoire 1 With 25% 45% 27% 54%
Without 6% 32% 13% 27%
P (χ 2) 0.000 0.057 0.001 0.000
2 With 45% 60% 46% 60%
Without 21% 27% 23% 34%
P (χ 2) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
3 With 30% 31% 30% 35%
Without 19% 21% 19% 16%
P (χ 2) 0.023 0.175 0.018 0.006
Senegal 1 With 42% 71% 42% 72%
Without 28% 46% 30% 50%
P (χ 2) 0.251 0.104 0.302 0.135
2 With 75% 83%
Without 56% 71%
P (χ 2) 0.024 0.122
3 With 74% 77%
Without 52% 43%
P (χ 2) 0.031 0.003
Tanzania 2 With 10% 32% 11% 26%
Without 4% 7% 4% 22%
P (χ 2) 0.293 0.001 0.134 0.538
3 With 14% 42% 12% 45%
Without 0% 32% 2% 24%
P (χ 2) 0.006 0.244 0.072 0.02

Note. Table compares rates among those with chickens/those participating in SBCC with rates among those without chickens/not participating; probabilities associated with χ 2 tests are reported in bold for P < 0.1. All data come from the monitoring surveys described in the methods section. No data reported for Senegal, Waves 2 and 3, as nearly all households owned chickens. SBCC: social behaviour change communication.