Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 27;13(4):e12385. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12385

Table 4.

ATT difference % of different treatment effects

Mean HAZ score for treated group Mean HAZ score for control group ATT difference t Statistic ATT difference %
T1: Children with access to ICDS 41.30 39.32 1.98 0.70 6.64
T2: Children who go to ICDS for last 6 months 41.12 38.77 2.35 0.91 6.35
T3: Children who went to ICDS for 4 or more days preceding week 43.63 41.17 2.46 0.74 5.97
T4: Children who received eggs for more than 3 days a week 42.14 36.57 5.57 1.96 15.23 *
T5 Children whose mother received information about child nutrition from AWW 43.72 37.44 6.28 2.16 16.77**
T6: Children whose mother received information about her child growth from AWW 43.47 37.23 6.23 2.00 16.73 *

AWWs = Anganwari workers; ICDS = integrated child development scheme; ATT = average treatment effects on treated; HAZ = height‐for‐age z score.

**

Significant at 1% level.

*

Significant at 5% level.

Source: Analysis of primary data