Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 8;2010(8):CD003069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003069.pub4
Methods Randomised, split‐mouth study. Patients and outcome assessors blind. No withdrawals.
Participants Adults edentulous. 12 enrolled and results given for 12.
Interventions 2 groups. About 0.7 microlitre 0.2% chlorhexidine (Corsodyl) injected into the inner part of 3i Titamed fixture versus physiologic solution. Abutments immediately connected afterwards. Recall every week. Study duration: 6 weeks.
Outcomes Microbiological count, gingival index by Loe and Silness, crevicular fluid flow rate, modified plaque index by Mombelli each week for 6 weeks. 6‐week data used.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "Two implants per patient were randomly allocated to the test group and two to the control group". Written to the author: no reply.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Written to the author: no reply.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "The clinical measurements were done by the prosthodontist. Neither the prosthodontist, the patient, nor the microbiologist was informed about which fixture was in the test or control group".
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No loss to follow‐up.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No reply from author.
Other bias Unclear risk Unclear if there was any commercial funding.
Blinding of the patient? Low risk "Neither the prosthodontist, the patient, nor the microbiologist was informed about which fixture was in the test or control group".