| Methods | Randomised, split‐mouth study. Patients and outcome assessors blind. No withdrawals. | |
| Participants | Adults edentulous. 12 enrolled and results given for 12. | |
| Interventions | 2 groups. About 0.7 microlitre 0.2% chlorhexidine (Corsodyl) injected into the inner part of 3i Titamed fixture versus physiologic solution. Abutments immediately connected afterwards. Recall every week. Study duration: 6 weeks. | |
| Outcomes | Microbiological count, gingival index by Loe and Silness, crevicular fluid flow rate, modified plaque index by Mombelli each week for 6 weeks. 6‐week data used. | |
| Notes | ||
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "Two implants per patient were randomly allocated to the test group and two to the control group". Written to the author: no reply. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Written to the author: no reply. |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "The clinical measurements were done by the prosthodontist. Neither the prosthodontist, the patient, nor the microbiologist was informed about which fixture was in the test or control group". |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No loss to follow‐up. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No reply from author. |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | Unclear if there was any commercial funding. |
| Blinding of the patient? | Low risk | "Neither the prosthodontist, the patient, nor the microbiologist was informed about which fixture was in the test or control group". |