Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 5;13(2):e12299. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12299

Table 3.

SRQ and EPDS total scores (continuous outcomes) by intervention group (model with covariates and using multiple imputation for missing data on the covariates)

Result by study group Comparison between LNS and IFA group Comparison between MMN and IFA group
Variable LNS MMN IFA P‐valuea Difference in means (95 % CI) b Difference in means (95 % CI) b
6 months postpartum SRQ score, mean (SD), n 1.76 (2.73) n = 347 1.92 (2.75) n = 365 1.71 (2.67) n = 364 0.560 0.07 (−0.33 to 0.47) 0.20 (−0.19 to 0.59)
6 months postpartum EPDS score, mean (SD), n 5.78 (5.53) n = 339 5.43 (4.97) n = 356 5.54 (5.18) n = 362 0.654 0.38 (−0.38 to 1.13) 0.04 (−0.71 to 0.79)

IFA, iron‐folate; MMN, multiple micronutrients; LNS, lipid‐based nutrient supplements; SRQ, Self Reporting Questionnaire; EPDS, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval.

a

ANOVA.

b

ANCOVAR adjusting for antenatal SRQ score, assets score, social support, height, BMI at enrolment, gestational age at enrollment, haemoglobin at enrollment, age, maternal education, number of previous pregnancies, season at enrollment and twin pregnancy.