Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 9;39(2):783–802. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23882

Table 1.

Mean (SD) d′, accurate reaction time (ms) and the effect sizes (hedges’ g) of 2‐back and 3‐back after different stimulation conditions

2‐back 3‐back
BL T15 Z (p) Hedges’ g (95% CI) BL T15 Z (p) Hedges’ g (95% CI)
d′ (SD)
50% 3.53 (0.95) 3.59 (1.09) 0.078 (0.937) 0.06 (–0.65 0.78) 2.57 (1.24) 2.72 (1.39) 1.161 (0.245) 0.11 (–0.61 0.83)
75% 3.34 (0.96) 3.49 (1.04) 0.848 (0.397) 0.14 (–0.57 0.86) 2.67 (1.18) 2.75 (1.20) 0.094 (0.925) 0.07 (–0.65 0.75)
100% 3.47 (1.21) 3.58 (0.96) 0.471 (0.638) 0.09 (–0.62 0.81) 2.62 (1.15) 2.86 (1.30) 0.909 (0.363) 0.19 (–0.53 0.91)
Friedman's Anova

x 2 = 0.441,

p = .802

x 2 = 1.458,

p = .482

Reactiontime (SD)

50% 537.07 (136.31) 524.78 (131.21) −1.420 (0.156) −0.09 (–0.81 0.63) 583.67 (159.92) 575.22 (146.42) −0.454 (0.650) −0.05 (–0.77 0.66)
75% 521.74 (104.68) 518.81 (121.44) 0.000 (1.000) −0.03 (–0.74 0.69) 561.35 (117.92) 517.01 (87.14) −2.158 (0.031)a −0.42 (–1.14 0.31)
100% 487.26 (104.79) 514.59 (80.28) 1.022 (0.307) 0.28 (–0.43 1.00) 538.80 (146.16) 520.09 (108.04) 0.000 (1.000) −0.14 (–0.86 0.57)

Friedman's

Anova

x 2 = 2.678,

p = .262

x 2 = 1.458,

p = .482

a

indicates significant difference (p < .05).