Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 20;39(9):3742–3758. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24208

Table 4.

Structural connections between ROIs. Group differences in connections between individual occipito‐parietal, within occipito‐occipital and within parieto‐parietal node pairs

RTS‐VGPs > NVGPs
Connection RTS‐VGPs NVGPs
occipito‐parietal
CAL.L‐PCUN.L 14.52 (9.31) 10.84 (7.08)
CUN.L‐PCUN.L 36.52 (17.25) 28.48 (16.41)
SOG.R‐ANG.R 43.52 (44.33) 21.65 (38.83)
MOG.L‐ANG.R 50.65 (124.56) 8.19 (36.40)
MOG.L‐PCUN.L 25.84 (28.71) 12.74 (26.73)
MOG.R‐ANG.R 38.65 (30.82) 21.94 (15.53)
occipito‐occipital
CUN.L‐SOG.L 55.29 (28.78) 43.39 (25.44)
CUN.R‐MOG.R 14.52 (20.83) 5.45 (13.45)
MOG.R‐SOG.L 13.90 (35.10) 1.35 (6.29)
MOG.R‐SOG.R 93.00 (53.67) 69.35 (34.79)
MOG.L‐MOG.R 15.71 (52.41) 0.61 (3.41)
parieto‐parietal
ANG.R‐IPL.R 79.68 (37.03) 61.26 (42.41)
ANG.R‐PCUN.L 19.52 (53.45) 4.52 (13.81)

Values are mean and SD (SD in parentheses). A significant cluster (= .004) containing occipito‐parietal, occipito‐occipital and parieto‐parietal connections obtained by cluster‐based nonparametric permutation tests. For the abbreviations of the regions, see Figure 2. Only significant results are presented in the tables.