Skip to main content
. 2018 May 2;39(9):3586–3596. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24196

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of study participants

Children (DF = 9)Seed: IFG L pars triangularis (−51, 26, 2)
# Anatomical region (subregion voxels, % coverage) Hemisphere (left/right) Cluster size (voxels) t value Cluster p‐FDR Cluster coordinates (MNI)
1

IFG pars opercularis

Mid FG

Mid TG

Inf TG

683, 89%

715, 24%

642, 46%

383, 55%

L 7,060 18.55 <10 − 6 −50, 28, 4
2

IFG, pars triangularis

Orbital‐frontal cortex

293, 53%

265, 18%

R 829 12.06 <10 − 6 46, 26, −10
3

Frontal pole L

Frontal pole R Paracingulate G

2,561, 4%

144, 2%

128, 10%

L/R 669 10.92 <10 − 5 −8, 64, −2
4 Supramarginal G 134, 13% L 256 9.23 <10 − 3 −50, −42, 52
5

Amygdala

Hippocampus

138, 42%

29, 4%

L 244 7.69 <10 − 3 −20, −6, −14
6

Caudate nucleus

Putamen

100, 19%

61, 10%

L 163 6.16 <10 − 3 −12, 4, 16
Adolescents (DF = 12)
1

IFG pars opercularis

Mid FG

Temporal pole

Frontal pole

Sup FG

757, 99%

2,057, 70%

1,510, 64%

2,503, 36%

1,673, 59%

L 14,699 19.08 <10 − 6 −46, 30, 10
2

Inf TG

Mid TG

Supramarginal G

STG, posterior

416, 60%

605, 44%

455, 43%

104, 27%

L 4,419 11.99 <10 − 5 −50, −42, 48
3

IFG pars triangularis

IFG pars opercularis

401, 72%

161, 23%

R 1,848 7.62 <10 − 5 54, 42, −2
4 Cerebellum Crus 1 519, 21% R 825 6.90 <10 − 4 38, −62, −32
5

Caudate nucleus

Putamen

146, 27%

75, 9%

L 309 6.48 <10 − 3 −10, 16, 6
6 Caudate nucleus 143, 27% R 245 6.21 <10 − 3 −10, 10, 4
7 Temporal fusiform cortex 154, 49% L 198 5.49 <10 − 2 −36, −8, −38

Note. Abbreviations: DF = degree of freedom; FDR = false discovery rate; MNI = Montreal Neurological Institute.

Details of age, gender, and neuropsychological outcomes, EVT, PPVT scores are given.

#Cluster; voxel threshold (p‐uncorrected p < .001); cluster threshold (p‐FDR < .05); peak‐voxel location (in mm); statistics are one‐sided.