Skip to main content
. 2018 May 10;39(9):3663–3681. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24202

Table 4.

Classification performance evaluated using Analysis 3. 60% of data was used to build classifiers, which was then used to classify the remaining data

FC Class Accuracya (%) Sensitivitya (%) Specificitya (%) AUCa
Class I 79.5 ± 5.5 86.8 ± 8.9 78.6 ± 9.2 0.74 ± 0.06
Class II 84.5 ± 5.4 85.7 ± 7.9 84.0 ± 7.9 0.81 ± 0.08
Class III 86.2 ± 5.3 85.2 ± 8.0 87.5 ± 8.6 0.83 ± 0.07
Class IV 91.1 ± 4.3 90.0 ± 7.4 92.2 ± 6.5 0. 87 ± 0.07

Mean ± SD of performance measures were calculated over classifications using 30 different partitions of dataset.

Abbreviation: AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

a

Measures are significantly different between any two classes of FC compared, with < .001.