Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 10;39(4):1765–1776. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23950

Table 3.

Effect of regressing out potential confounds on the gender prediction performance (the Average FC method)

Frame displacement Handedness Age Blood pressure Weight Brain volume
Male–Female Gender difference (t‐statistic, p‐value) −0.9, 0.4 −2.9, 4E‐3 −5.4, 1E‐7 Systolic: 9.7, 5E‐21 Diastolic: 5.0, 8E‐7 13.5, 8E‐38 24.0, 9E‐97
Gender prediction AUC 0.93 (0.00)* 0.93 (0.00) 0.92 (−0.01) 0.89 (−0.04) 0.85 (−0.08) 0.76 (−0.17)

*Within parenthesis are the drop in AUC compared to the AUC before regressing out the confound.