Skip to main content
. 2018 May 7;39(9):3728–3741. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24207

Table 3.

Summary of the performances for HC versus MCI classification

Method Modality ACC (%) SEN (%) SPEC (%) BAC (%) PPV (%) NPV (%)
SK‐SVM MRI 70.86 40.38 86.87 63.63 61.76 73.50
PET 82.78 57.69 95.96 76.83 88.24 81.20
CSF 68.21 50.00 77.78 63.89 54.17 74.76
CONCAT 85.43 67.31 94.95 81.13 87.50 84.68
ELM MRI 70.86 40.38 86.87 63.63 61.76 73.50
PET 82.78 57.69 95.96 76.83 88.24 81.20
CSF 68.21 50.00 77.78 63.89 54.17 74.76
CONCAT 85.43 67.31 94.95 81.13 87.50 84.68
MK‐SVM with linear kernel MRI + PET + CSF 85.43 65.38 95.96 80.67 89.47 84.07
MK‐SVM with RBF kernel MRI + PET + CSF 84.11 71.15 90.91 81.03 80.43 85.71
SAE CONCAT 84.77 89.90 75.00 82.45 87.25 79.59
MHS‐ELM (ELM_RBF) MRI + PET + CSF 87.09 75.00 91.92 83.46 82.98 87.50

Note. Boldface denotes the best performance in individual metric for each classification task.