Table 3.
Categorization of SIM Initiative States Based on Implementation Variation
| State | Behavioral Health Focus | Payment Reform Depth and Breadth | Per-Capita Funding | Summary Scorea | Weighted Summary Scoreb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lowest-Scoring States | |||||
| Connecticut | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1.2c |
| Michigan | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1.4c |
| Iowa | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1.6c |
| Intermediate-Scoring States | |||||
| Massachusetts | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1.8 |
| Minnesota | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1.8 |
| New York | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1.8 |
| Ohio | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 1.8 |
| Washington | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1.8 |
| Idaho | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 1.8 |
| Arkansas | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 2 |
| Oregon | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 2 |
| Tennessee | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 2 |
| Rhode Island | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 2.2 |
| Vermont | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 2.2 |
| Highest-Scoring States | |||||
| Delaware | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 2.6d |
| Maine | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 2.6d |
| Colorado | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 2.8d |
SIM indicates State Innovation Models.
a
Summary Score = Behavioral health focus + payment reform depth and breadth + per-capita funding
b
Weighted Summary Score = Behavioral health focus*(0.4) + payment reform depth and breadth*(0.4) + per-capita funding*(0.2)
c
Indicates lowest scoring states.
d
Indicates highest scoring states.