Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Ther. 2019 Jan 4;50(6):1016–1029. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2018.12.006

Table 2.

Equivalence of Treatment and Control Groups at Wave 1 (N = 692 individuals)

Treatment (n = 344)
Control (n =348)
Test
Variables Mean SD Mean SD Statistice p value
Demographics characteristics
 Marital status a,b 65% N/A 61% N/A 0.22 .66
 Children in homea 3.07 1.50 2.87 1.45 1.22 .22
 Incomec 2.89 2.11 2.77 2.13 0.52 .60
 Educationd 5.48 1.84 5.46 1.66 1.88 .17
 Age 38.12 8.64 38.25 8.87 1.63 .20
Relationship variables
 Relationship communication 0.01 5.71 0.14 5.28 0.13 .72
 Relationship confidence 17.30 3.34 17.61 2.94 0.02 .88
 Relationship satisfaction 24.48 4.92 25.14 4.03 0.61 .43
 Partner support 20.75 3.95 21.23 3.63 0.01 .91
 Coparenting 83.53 10.45 84.31 10.20 0.04 .83

Note.

a

Based on female/main caregiver report. 0 = Unmarried, cohabiting. 1 = Married

b

0 = Unmarried, cohabiting. 1 = Married.

c

Gross family monthly income divided by 1,000.

d

1 = Below grade 9; 11= Doctorate or professional degree.

e

t-test for continuous and ordinal variables; chi-square cross-tab statistic for binary variables. All comparisons not significant p > .05. Comparisons involving responses from men and women calculated using repeated-measures ANOVA with members of couple treated as “repeated measures” and ProSAAF/control assignment as a between-groups factor, to account for non-independence.