Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Ther. 2019 Mar 23;50(6):1075–1086. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2019.03.004

Table 5.

Chi-Square Difference for Alternative Bivariate Latent Difference Score Models

Index Model 1: Both Model 2: Model 3: Model 4:
Couplings AP to EQ Only EQ to AP Only No Coupling
χ2/df 873.94/303 874.62/304 889.37/304 889.39/305
p <.001 <.001 <.001 <.001
∆χ2/∆df -- 0.68/1 15.43/1 15.45/2
p .41 <.001 <.001
RMSEA .18 .18 .18 .18
CI .16 − .19 .16 - .19 .17−.20 .17−.19
Fit significantly degraded? -- No Yes Yes

Note. AP = Anticipatory processing question from the Weekly Assessment; EQ = decentering subscale of the Experiences Questionnaire; RMSEA = root-mean-square error of approximation; CI = confidence interval of the RMSEA. Bold represents the selected model.