Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 4;38(2):704–714. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23410

Table 2.

Results of baseline MRI features separating resilient from non‐resilient UHR individuals (models B) and quantitative predictions of long‐term functional and clinical outcome (models C)

Binary models (B) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Average accuracy (%) P
Cortical Volume 71 67 69 0.015*
Surface area 47 42 44 n.s.
Cortical thickness 47 50 49 n.s.
Gyrification 69 78 73 0.016*
Subcortical volume 59 75 67 0.047*
SIPS Disorganization (all) 76 71 74 0.001**
SIPS Disorganization (gyrification subset) 75 78 76 0.002**
Gyrification + Subcortical Volume 69 78 73 0.021*
SIPS Disorganization + Gyrification 69 83 76 0.005**
SIPS Disorganization + Subcortical Volume 76 71 74 0.013*
SIPS Disorganization + Cortical Volume 59 75 67 0.002**
SIPS Disorganization + Gyrification + Subcortical Volume 69 94 82 0.003**
Continuous models (C) r P
Model C1: mGAF score at 6‐yr follow‐up
Gyrification 0.382 0.048*
Subcortical Volume 0.424 0.008**
SIPS Disorganization + Gyrification + Subcortical Volume 0.327 n.s.
Model C2: SIPS Positive score at 6‐yr follow‐up
Cortical thickness 0.258 n.s.
Model C3: SIPS Negative score at 6‐yr follow‐up
Subcortical Volume 0.349 0.048*
Model C4: SIPS Disorganization score at 6‐yr follow‐up
Gyrification 0.411 0.044*
Subcortical Volume 0.342 n.s.
SIPS Disorganization + Gyrification + Subcortical Volume 0.378 n.s.

Notes: aSubgroups are based on functional outcome at 6‐year follow‐up.

UHR = Individuals at ultra‐high risk for psychosis; mGAF = Modified Global Assessment of Functioning; SIPS = Structured Interview for Prodromal Symptoms; n.s. = non‐significant.

*P < 0.05.

**P < 0.01.