Figure 4.

Average percent signal changes (A) and classification rates (B) for static and dynamic facial expressions in object‐defined motion‐sensitive ROIs. The black line indicates chance level, and all error bars indicate the SEM. * indicates statistical significance with one‐sample or paired t‐test, P < 0.05 (FDR corrected for number of ROIs). In both object‐defined ROIs, classification accuracies for dynamic facial expressions were significantly above chance level, and both the activation and classification performance were significantly higher for the dynamic compared with the static facial expressions.