Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 13;38(3):1702–1715. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23499

Table 3.

Multiple regression results between significant cluster from the dual‐regression analysis and clinical variables from the MCI diagnostic criteria

Dual‐regression TFCE GLM corrected clusters GLM: Voxel ∼ B1*variable + age + gender + YoE + LEDD

HC vs.

PD‐NC

Variable Number of voxels B1 Min P‐value MNI coordinate Brain region
LFPN‐23 PRM 6 0.23716 0.0028 −6,30,−8 L subcallosal cortex
LFPN‐23 ToL 1 0.18869 0.0074 −6,26,−4 L subcallosal cortex
MN2‐14 PoA 7 0.005 0.0012 −30,−94,24 L occipital pole
MN2‐14 PoA 3 0.0059 0.00053 34,−86,40 R cerebral cortex
MN2‐14 PoA 1 0.00591 0.00063 −46,−82,28 L cerebral cortex
FPN‐20 SRM 4 0.47865 9.10E‐005 38,18,56 R middle frontal gyrus
FPN‐20 SRM 3 0.41244 0.0011 18,−46,76 R superior parietal lobule
FPN‐20 SRM 2 0.40269 0.0029 38,−2,68 R precentral gyrus
FPN‐20 SRM 1 0.36416 0.0023 22,−26,80 R postcentral gyrus
FPN‐22 UPDRS 2 −0.073 0.00046 42,−46,68 R superior parietal lobule
FPN‐22 UPDRS 2 −0.08 0.00053 42,−50,68 R superior Parietal lobule

HC vs.

PD‐MCI

LFPN‐23 SRM 1 −0.2610 0.0025 −30,38,24 L frontal pole
TEMP‐24 PAL 1 −0.7557 0.0021 62,6,36 R precentral gyrus
VN2‐25 PAL 3 −0.9386 0.0088 −46,−18,52 L postcentral gyrus
PD‐NC vs. PD‐MCI
VAN‐28 MoCA 2 0.13936 0.002277 26,−10,40 R precentral gyrus
VAN‐28 MoCA 1 0.11588 0.0042 18,−18,40 R cingulate gyrus, posterior division
VAN‐28 PRM 10 0.16192 0.0002 18,−14,40 R cingulate gyrus, anterior division
dmPFN‐32 ToL 13 0.0036 0.00064 −34,−10,76 L precentral gyrus
dmPFN‐32 ToL 6 0.0037 0.0022 −30,−38,72 L postcentral gyrus

Cluster significance was assessed with FSL‐randomise with threshold free cluster enhancement (TFCE) correction for multiple comparisons.

YoE, years of education; LEDD, Levodopa equivalent daily dose; GLM, general linear model; PoA, power of attention; ToL, Tower of London; R/L, right and left hemisphere.