Skip to main content
. 2017 May 31;38(8):4169–4184. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23656

Table 1.

Modeling development trajectories of network components

Regression coefficients
Component Best model AIC Adjusted R 2 P –log10(p) β 1 β 2 β 3
Aa age + age2 + sex 544.28 0.09 <0.01 3.89 2.13 −3.13 −0.15
Ba age + age2 + sex 539.04 0.11 <0.01 4.96 −2.28 −2.63 0.29
Ca age + age2 552.15 0.05 <0.01 2.37 2.71 −1.83
Da age + age2 534.21 0.13 <0.01 6.21 −4.81 −1.93
Ea age + age2 533.10 0.13 <0.01 6.45 4.18 −3.21
Fa age + age2 544.10 0.08 <0.01 4.09 0.47 −4.23
Ga age 520.00 0.19 <0.01 9.75 6.08
Ha age 508.38 0.23 <0.01 12.29 6.79
Ia age + age2 534.87 0.13 <0.01 6.07 4.61 −2.24
Ja age + age2 + sex 526.97 0.16 <0.01 7.46 5.01 −1.90 −0.17
K sex 558.34 0.01 0.09 1.04 −0.12
La age 545.73 0.07 <0.01 4.04 3.85
M age + sex 556.79 0.02 0.04 1.37 1.41 −0.15
Na age 545.37 0.07 <0.01 4.12 −3.89
Oa age + sex 515.58 0.21 <0.01 10.19 6.10 −0.17
Pa age 551.21 0.04 <0.01 2.78 3.12
Qa age 538.22 0.11 <0.01 5.73 4.65
R age + age2 557.08 0.02 0.05 1.31 1.97 −1.46
Sa age + age2 543.80 0.09 <0.01 4.16 4.00 −1.56
T age 555.30 0.02 0.02 1.81 −2.41
U intercept only 559.23 0.00
V sex 557.16 0.02 0.05 1.34 −0.14
a

Model significant at P < 0.01.