Table 3.
WM Tract | skeleton – FA | skeleton – FA‐FW | VBA – FA | VBA – FA‐FW |
---|---|---|---|---|
ATR L | R = −0.133 | R = −0.013 | R = −0.111 | R = 0.025 |
CST L | R = −0.150 | R = −0.035 | R = −0.138 | R = −0.037 |
IFOF L | R = −0.054 | R = 0.022 | R = −0.075 | R = −0.005 |
ILF L | R = −0.065 | R = −0.008 | R = −0.100 | R = −0.051 |
SLF L | R = −0.133 | R = −0.089 | R = −0.136 | R = −0.080 |
UF L | R = 0.004 | R = 0.059 | R = −0.019 | R = −0.052 |
WM Tract | skeleton – RD | skeleton – RD‐FW | VBA – RD | VBA – RD‐FW |
---|---|---|---|---|
ATR L | R = 0.154 | R = 0.073 | R = 0.171 | R = −0.023 |
CST L | R = 0.284b | R = 0.252a | R =0.266a | R = 0.008 |
IFOF L | R = 0.092 | R = −0.051 | R = 0.096 | R = −0.006 |
ILF L | R = 0.077 | R = −0.035 | R = 0.105 | R = 0.005 |
SLF L | R = 0.271a | R = 0.032 | R = 0.172 | R = 0.053 |
UF L | R = 0.046 | R = 0.088 | R = 0.072 | R = −0.037 |
p < .05 (Bonferroni corrected).
p < .01 (Bonferroni corrected).
Correlations were computed only within the MDD group. Bonferroni correction was used to correct the P values for multiple comparisons. Significant correlations were found for RD index inside the CST L and SLF L for the skeletonized analysis and inside the CST L for the VBA analysis. For RD‐FW only inside the CST L when the skeletonized approach was used. The names of the tracts are the same of Table 2.