. 2016 Aug 1;37(12):4640–4653. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23334

Table 4.

Results of simple contrasts for the ANOVA between poststimulus time and site for component 2

Site comparison	Poststimulus time point (seconds)
Site comparison	1	3	5	7	9	11	13
Duke/UNC vs. BWH			↓^*	↓^*		↑^***
Duke/UNC vs. MGH	↑^*			↓^*
Duke/UNC vs. UNM		↑^**		↓^**		↑^*	↑^*
Duke/UNC vs. Yale		↑^***		↓^**
BWH vs. MGH	↑^*				↓^*	↓^*
BWH vs. UNM		↑^*	↑^**
BWH vs. Yale		↑^**	↑^*		↓^*	↓^***
MGH vs. UNM	↓^*	↑^*
MGH vs. Yale		↑^**
UNM vs. Yale						↓^*

Arrows denote higher or lower activity as indicated. ^* = P < 0.05; ^** = P < 0.005; ^*** = P < 0.001.