Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 6;37(11):3721–3732. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23270

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study population, tumor, and stimulation points

Patients (n) 98
Age (years) 40.5 ± 10.8
Male: Female ratio 1.3
Handedness (%)
Right 84
Left 11
Ambidextrous 5
Tumor side (%)
Right 43
Left 57
Tumor location (n)
FTI 27
F 23
T 12
P 9
FI 9
TI 7
R 4
I 3
TO 2
C 2
O 0
Tumor volume (ml) (mean ± SD; [range]) 58.0 ± 42.8; [0.8–180]
Stimulation current intensity (mA) (mean ± SD; [range]) 2.23 ± 0.524; [1.1–5.0]
Sensori‐motor positive mapping (%) 100
Language positive mapping (%) 42
Stimulation points (n, mean ± SD; [range]) n = 462, 4.7 ± 2.5; [1–11]
Sensori‐motor stimulation points (n, mean ± SD; [range]) n = 383, 3.9 ± 2.2; [1–11]
Language stimulation points (n, mean ± SD; [range]) n = 79, 0.8 ± 1.2; [0–6]

Legend: F = frontal; T = temporal; I = insular; P = parietal; R = rolandic; O = occipital; C = cingular.