Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 6;37(11):3707–3720. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23269

Table 2.

Regression analysis SUV of the thalamus, FA, and group (healthy vs. brain injured)

SUV FA R 2 Beta 95% confidence interval Sum Sq Df F P‐value
Thalamus Thalamo‐frontal 0.722
FA 0.538 −1.029 2.105 0.026 1 0.309 0.581
Group 0.947 −0.819 2.713 4.823 1 56.763 0.000 ***
Interaction −0.988 −5.216 3.240 0.019 1 0.221 0.640
Residuals 3.908 46
Thalamus Thalamo‐inferiorparietal 0.721
FA 0.523 −1.358 2.404 0.036 1 0.425 0.518
Group 0.425 −1.623 2.474 4.338 1 50.929 0.000 ***
Interaction 0.255 −4.591 5.101 0.001 1 0.011 0.916
Residuals 3.833 45
Thalamus Thalamo‐precuneus 0.731
FA 1.322 −0.882 3.526 0.083 1 1.007 0.321
Group 1.100 −0.641 2.841 4.200 1 50.900 0.000 ***
Interaction −1.411 −5.623 2.801 0.038 1 0.456 0.503
Residuals 3.713 45

Statistics and confidence interval of the regression models to predict SUV using FA of adjacent tracts and group (brain‐injured patients or healthy control subjects). * = P < 0.05, ** = P < 0.01, *** = P < 0.00.