Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 6;37(11):3707–3720. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23269

Table 5.

Regression analysis SUV of the inferioparietal cortex FA, and group (healthy vs. brain injured)

SUV FA R2 Beta 95% confidence interval Sum Sq Df F P‐value
Inferior parietal Thalamo‐inferioparietal 0.683
FA 5.278 2.989 7.567 2.562 1 20.321 0.000 ***
Group 1.824 −0.668 4.317 1.075 1 8.528 0.005 **
Interaction −3.697 −9.593 2.199 0.201 1 1.595 0.213
Residuals 5.673 45
Inferior parietal frontal‐inferioparietal 0.585
FA 2.961 0.680 5.241 1.216 1 6.928 0.012 *
Group 0.863 −1.705 3.431 0.953 1 5.426 0.024 *
Interaction −1.395 −7.597 4.808 0.036 1 0.205 0.653
Residuals 7.901 45
Inferior parietal Precuneus‐inferioparietal 0.668
FA 3.283 1.656 4.910 2.477 1 18.739 0.000 ***
Group 0.502 −1.020 2.023 1.400 1 10.591 0.002 **
Interaction −0.552 −4.525 3.421 0.010 1 0.078 0.781
Residuals 5.949 45

Statistics and confidence interval of the regression models to predict SUV using FA of adjacent tracts and group (brain‐injured patients or healthy control subjects). * = P < 0.05, ** = P < 0.01, *** = P < 0.00.