Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 7;37(6):2263–2275. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23171

Table 2.

Mean value of oral responsiveness to individual attributes for thermal tasters (TTs) and thermal‐non tasters (TnTs), F‐values and associated P‐values from the MANOVAa are provided

Stimulus Group Mean F‐value P‐value
Taste NaCl TnTs 1.369 0.35 0.558
TTs 1.420
CitricAcid TnTs 1.392 1.90 0.175
TTs 1.504
Sucrose TnTs 1.023 3.91 0.054b
TTs 1.193
Quinine TnTs 1.487 0.93 0.340
TTs 1.387
PROP TnTs 0.698 0.59 0.810
TTs 0.741
Temperature Warming TnTs 1.305 3.84 0.056b
TTs 1.416
Cooling TnTs 1.569 0.01 0.935
TTs 1.565
a

Wilks’ Lambda test indicated a significant group effect for overall responsiveness (P = 0.041).

b

Approaching significance (P = 0.05).