Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 11;37(5):1749–1758. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23132

Table 1.

List of 37 studies included in the ALE analysis

Paper Imaging method Statistical comparison Stat. threshold n of included clusters
Functional studies FMS vs controls
Brown et al. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2014;39:663–672. EEG 16 FMS, 15 HC, 16 OA corr. 0.05 14
Burgmer et al. Psychosom. Med. 2011;73:751–759. fMRI 12 FMS, 14 HC corr. 0.05 2
Burgmer et al. Eur. J. Pain 2012;16:636–647. fMRI 17 FMS, 17 HC corr. 0.05 3
Glass et al. J. Pain 2011;12:1219–1229. fMRI 18 FMS, 14 HC corr. 0.05 10
Gracely et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:1333–1343. fMRI 16 FMS, 16 HC corr. 0.05 14
Guedj et al. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2007a;34:130–134. SPECT 18 FMS, 10 HC corr. 0.05 18
Harris et al. J. Neurosci. 2007;27:10000–10006. PET 17 FMS, 17 HC corr. 0.05 4
Jensen et al. Pain 2009;144:95–100. fMRI 16 FMS, 16 HC uncorr. 0.005 2
Jensen et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:3293–3303.a fMRI 26 FMS, 13 HC corr. 0.05 1
Kim et al. PLoS One 2013;8:e74099. fMRI 21 FMS, 11 HC corr. 0.05 8
Loggia et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:203–212. fMRI 31 FMS, 14 HC corr. 0.05 25
Lopez‐Sola et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:3200–3209. fMRI 35 FMS, 25 HC corr. 0.05 8
Maestu et al. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2013;124:752–760. MEG 9 FMS, 9 HC corr. 0.01 9
Martinsen et al. PLoS One 2014;9:e108637. fMRI 23 FMS, 28 HC uncorr. 0.001 7
Pujol et al. PLoS One 2009;4:e5224. fMRI 9 FMS, 9 HC corr. 0.05 14
Usui et al. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2010;12:R64. SPECT 29 FMS, 10 HC corr. 0.05 10
Wik et al. Neuroreport 2003;14:619–621. PET 8 FMS, 8 HC corr. 3
Wood et al. J. Pain 2007;8:51–58. PET 6 FMS, 8 HC uncorr. 0.01 14
Functional studies within FMS
Boyer et al. Neurology 2014;82:1231–1238. PET 16 FMS, 13 FMS uncorr. 0.001 1
Guedj et al. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2007c;34:2115–2119. SPECT 11 FMS, 6 FMS uncorr. 0.001 3
Harris et al. Neuroimage 2009;47:1077–1085. PET 10 FMS, 10 FMS corr. 0.05 2
Jensen et al. Pain 2012;153:1495–1503. fMRI 19 FMS, 15 FMS corr. 0.05 1
Jensen et al. J. Pain 2014;15:1328–1337. fMRI 21 FMS, 16 FMS corr. 0.05 1
Schmidt‐Wilcke et al. Pain Med. 2014;15:1346–1358. fMRI 8 FMS, 8 FMS corr. 0.05 1
Wik et al. Eur. J. Pain 1999;3:7–12. PET 8 FMS (pre/post) uncorr. 0.00 10
Structural studies
Ceko et al. Neuroimage Clin. 2013;3:249–260. VBM 27 FMS, 26 HC corr. 0.05 9
Fallon et al. Neuroimage Clin. 2013;3:163–170. VBM 16 FMS, 15 HC corr. 0.05 4
Hsu et al. Pain 2009;143:262–267. VBM 29 FMS, 29 HC corr. 0.05 0
Jensen et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:3293–3303.a cortical thickness 26 FMS, 13 HC corr. 0.05 7
Kim et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:3190–3199. DTI 19 FMS, 18 HC corr. 0.05 1
Schmidt‐Wilcke et al. Pain 2007;132 Suppl 1:S109–S116. VBM 20 FMS, 22 HC corr. 0.05 3
Connectivity studies
Flodin et al. Brain Connect. 2014;4:587–594. rsMRI 16 FMS, 22 HC corr. 0.05 6
Harris et al. Anesthesiology 2013;119:1453–1464. rsMRI 14 FMS (pre/post) uncorr. 0.05 6
Ichesco et al. J. Pain 2014;15:815–826.e1. rsMRI 18 FMS, 18 HC corr. 0.05 8
Jensen et al. Mol. Pain 2012;8:32–8069‐8‐32. fMRI 28 FMS, 14 HC corr. 0.05 4
Napadow et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:2545–2555. rsMRI 18 FMS, 18 HC corr. 0.05 5
Napadow et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:2398–2403. fMRI 17 FMS (pre/post) corr. 0.05 2
Pujol et al. Pain 2014;155:1492–1503. rsMRI 40 FMS, 36 HC corr. 0.05 34
a

aStudy of Jensen included functional and structural analyses.

SPECT = Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography, PET = Positron Emission Tomography, VBM = Voxel‐based morphometry, DTI = diffusion tensor imaging, fMRI = functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, rsMRI = resting‐state MRI, EEG = Electroencephalography, MEG = Magnetoencephalography, sr = seed regression, ICN = intrinsic connectivity network.