Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Gay Lesbian Ment Health. 2018 Dec 27;23(1):63–82. doi: 10.1080/19359705.2018.1539428

Table 3.

Indirect effect of enacted individual-level stigma on negative affect through anticipated relationship stigma: Model parameters

Negative affect
R2 = .11
Anticipated relationship stigma
R2 = .11
Enacted individual-level stigma
R2 = .13
B 95% CI β B 95% CI β B 95% CI β
Enacted individual-level stigma 0.16** (0.06, 0.26) .30 0.12** (0.03, 0.21) .20 -- -- --
Anticipated relationship stigma 0.04 (−0.13, 0.22) .05 -- -- -- -- -- --
Gender (ref = female) −1.00 (−3.05, 1.05) −.10 −0.33 (−2.10, 1.44) .03 −4.28** (−6.39, −1.28) −.23
Age 0.04 (−0.03, 0.11) .11 −0.01 (−0.08, 0.05) −.03 −0.18** (−0.28, −0.09) −.26
Race (ref = non-white) 0.49 (−1.08, 2.06) .06 −2.18** (−3.75, −0.60) −.22 −0.33 (−3.02, 2.36) −.02

NOTE: B = unstandardized regression coefficient; β = standardized regression coefficient;

**

p ≤ .01.