Table 4. Comparisons Delphi results between China and USA.
Panel A: 2nd Delphi results in China | Panel B: 2nd Delphi results in the U.S. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
China Rank | HCB activity/ program | Score | USA Rank | HCB activity/ program | Score |
1 | Emergency preparedness or disaster relief | 4.85 | 1 | Charity care | 4.71 |
1 | Adhering/complying with government mandates | 4.85 | 2 | Emergency preparedness above what is required for license | 4.36 |
3 | Health promotion and health education | 4.75 | 3 | Disaster relief above what is required | 4.29 |
4 | Environmental protection | 4.70 | 3 | Social benefit activities | 4.29 |
4 | Education and research | 4.70 | 5 | Health promotion and health education | 4.21 |
6 | Charity care | 4.65 | 6 | Education and research | 4.07 |
6 | High quality medical services | 4.65 | 7 | Environmental protection that directly affect the heath of population, above what is required for license | 4.00 |
8 | Medical services with positive externality | 4.45 | 7 | Provision of low profit services | 4.00 |
9 | Provision of low profit services | 4.35 | 9 | Sliding scale fees based on income level | 3.93 |
10 | Social benefit activities | 4.35 | 10 | Medicaid shortfall | 3.86 |
11 | Bad debt | 4.10 | 10 | Medical services with positive externality | 3.79 |
12 | Discounted pricing | 4.10 | 12 | Bad debt to low-income group | 3.57 |
13 | Tax payments | 3.65 | 13 | Bad debt because of catastrophic expenditure | 3.43 |
14 | Tax payments or payments in lieu of taxes | 3.14 | |||
15 | High quality medical services | 2.50 | |||
16 | Adhering/complying with government mandates | 2.43 |
Sources: Study findings; China: 2010, USA: 2014