Bala 2006.
Methods | Study design: randomized controlled trial (2 arms) Study duration: not reported Study setting: hospital, single centre, India |
|
Participants | Adult patients undergoing elective supratentorial craniotomy for brain tumours (n = 40) Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Mean age, range (years)
Numbers allocated to each arm
Male gender
|
|
Interventions |
Technique and timing Scalp block of the following nerves with 0.5% bupivacaine and adrenaline 1:400,000 adrenaline
versus scalp block, with saline and adrenaline 1:400,000, at the end of surgery Dosage 20 mL |
|
Outcomes |
Primary
Secondary
|
|
Notes |
Funding No funding source reported |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: ''patients were randomly divided into two groups using a computer generated random number chart''. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Authors did not provide any details regarding how the allocation sequence was concealed. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: ''the neurosurgeon, the anaesthetist performing the scalp block and the patients were blinded to the drug being administered''. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: ''the anaesthetist performing the block did not participate in the postoperative pain assessment''. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All enrolled participants were followed up for outcomes. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Outcomes reported as specified |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Small study |