Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Nov 20;9:17138. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53219-w

Numerical modelling of the effects of cold atmospheric plasma on mitochondrial redox homeostasis and energy metabolism

Tomoyuki Murakami 1,
PMCID: PMC6868247  PMID: 31748630

Abstract

A biochemical reaction model clarifies for the first time how cold atmospheric plasmas (CAPs) affect mitochondrial redox homeostasis and energy metabolism. Fundamental mitochondrial functions in pyruvic acid oxidation, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and oxidative phosphorylation involving the respiratory chain (RC), adenosine triphosphate/adenosine diphosphate (ATP/ADP) synthesis machinery and reactive oxygen species/reactive nitrogen species (ROS/RNS)-mediated mechanisms are numerically simulated. The effects of CAP irradiation are modelled as 1) the influx of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to an ROS regulation system and 2) the change in mitochondrial transmembrane potential induced by RNS on membrane permeability. The CAP-induced stress modifies the dynamics of intramitochondrial H2O2 and superoxide anions, i.e., the rhythm and shape of ROS oscillation are disturbed by H2O2 infusion. Furthermore, CAPs control the ROS oscillatory behaviour, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide redox state and ATP/ADP conversion through the reaction mixture over the RC, the TCA cycle and ROS regulation system. CAPs even induce a homeostatic or irreversible state transition in cell metabolism. The present computational model demonstrates that CAPs crucially affect essential mitochondrial functions, which in turn affect redox signalling, metabolic cooporation and cell fate decision of survival or death.

Subject terms: Plasma physics, Computational science, Biochemistry

Introduction

For aerobic organisms, cellular respiration is one of the most fundamental processes in which oxygen is used to generate energy from carbohydrates (oxidative metabolism). The cellular respiration involving electron transfer is known to be redox, i.e., both reduction and oxidation occurring simultaneously. The redox system involved is essential in maintaining cellular homeostasis through the balance between reactive species generation and elimination, and the redox signalling to and from mitochondria1,2. Mitochondria produce significant amounts of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and superoxide anions (O2) during energy metabolism as well as oxidation. Cells can use ROS not only to kill invading pathogens, but also as a key regulator of various signalling pathways3. Furthermore, mitochondria have a central role in energy metabolism including adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) production and exchange4. The integrity of these mitochondrial functions is fundamental to cell life2,3,5.

Cold atmospheric plasmas (CAPs) are weakly ionised gases at around atmospheric pressure, in which the electron energy is up to electron volt order while the heavy-particle temperature is around room temperature. Recently, CAPs have been widely applied in the field of biomedicine, such as blood coagulation6, inactivation of bacteria, microorganisms or viruses7,8, tumour or cancer treatment911 and induction of apoptotic/necrotic cell death12,13. In these works, specific CAP effects on cells and biomolecules via various pathways have been extensively investigated. A number of works have suggested that a strength of CAPs is their ability to deliver multimodal treatments utilising the simultaneous and controllable delivery of electric fields, ions, photons and reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (RONS) both in the gas phase and liquid phase. In particular, the RONS has been implicated as a potential causative agent. ROS such as atomic oxygen, singlet delta oxygen molecules, ozone and hydroxyl radicals as well as H2O2 and O2 are known as highly reactive species. Some works have pointed out that CAP-induced intracellar ROS generation affects cell survival/death11,14. RNS including nitric oxide (NO) and peroxynitrite (ONOO) in a cell affect mitochondrial transmembrane permeability15,16. Recent experimental studies have shown that CAPs deteriorate the mitochondrial transmembrane potential (Δψ) and also significantly influence cell survival and death12,13,17,18. Table 1 shows the key factors of previous CAP experiments. One of the hypotheses derived from this context is that mitochondrial functions stimulated by CAP-induced RONS generation are critical to biological outcomes. However, a mechanistic understanding of how CAPs exerts their biological effects is still elusive.

Table 1.

Key factors of some previous CAP experimental works. Potential causative CAP agent, the type of human cell used in experiments and major intracellular effects induced by CAP.

CAP agent Human cell type Major intracellular effect Ref.
H2O2 PA-TU-8988T, U87MG H2O2 change, Apoptotic cell death 11
H2O2, OH 3T3-L1 Δψ change, Ca2+ change 12
H2O2, NO2, NO3 HEK293T Δψ change, Ca2+ change, Apoptotic cell death 13
ROS, RNS HaCaT GSH change, Basolateral ATP release 17
H2O2, Nitrite HaCaT, HCT-116, SK-MEL-28 RONS change, Δψ change, Proteasome activity, Oxidative protein damage 18

To understand the precise cell functions underlying such effects, systematic biological-reaction models suitable for CAP studies are necessary. To date, various numerical models have been developed to study CAP-induced RONS agents and their multiphase interactions19 in the gas phase2023, in the liquid phase24,25, at the gas–liquid interface26,27 and with biological targets from macroscopic2830 and microscopic viewpoints31,32. Despite great progress being made in modelling studies, they have not been applied to intracellular biochemical processes. Significant gaps still exist in our knowledge of fundamental mechanisms that can bridge CAP physics and molecular biology.

The objective of this work is to propose an integrative systematic intracellular-level numerical model to gain new insights into CAP interactions with mitochondrial functions. Figure 1 shows an essential mechanism of mitochondria considered in the present model. The model simulates a mitochondrial redox-mediated function and energy metabolism under the influence of CAP-originating RONS penetration. Specifically, the effects of external H2O2 influx and transmembrane potential disturbance on pyruvic acid oxidation, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and oxidative phosphorylation involving the respiratory chain (RC), the ATP synthesis machinery and the ROS-regulation system are examined. This nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD, i.e., NADH as a reduced NAD and NAD+ as an oxidised NAD)-mediated biochemical network is kinetically solved through a time-dependent zero-dimensional simulation involving 23 biochemical agents and 26 reaction pathways. Two indexes are used to represent CAP-induced changes in parameters: H2O2 inflow flux from the external environment into the mitochondrial matrix (ΓH2O2,ex of up to 1.0 μM/s) and the variation in the transmembrane potential (Δψ of 150 mV ± 20 mV). The effects of CAP-induced stress on mitochondrial functions are quantified with particular emphasis on the rhythm and stability of ROS, the behaviour of NAD and the ATP/ADP metabolism. The knowledge on how the CAP-induced effects emerge from the whole biochemical dynamics will enable a realistic assessment of the importance of CAP active agents in cellular processes and biomedical outcomes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Essential mechanism simulated in the present biochemical reaction model. The effects of externally applied CAP are illustrated. The functions of the cell membrane, cytosol and glycolysis are not taken into account.

Results

ROS perturbs redox homeostasis

How CAP-induced reactive species perturb redox homeostasis is examined with particular emphasis on the mitochondrial ROS regulation activity. To understand the dynamics of the ROS regulation system and the influence of the external inflow flux of hydrogen peroxide (ΓH2O2,ex) on the mitochondrial activity, the time courses of H2O2, O2, NADH and ATP concentrations are shown in Fig. 2, where Δψ is fixed at 150 mV (which is the standard value for normal cell activity). The results before t =15 min are obtained without the CAP influence. As shown in Fig. 2(a)–(c), the H2O2 and O2 concentrations widely oscillate in the range of 105–0.1 μM in the first 15 min. They show synchronised oscillatory dynamics, whose cyclic period is about 5 min. NADH slightly fluctuates with a ripple factor of 2% [Fig. 2(d)]. The ripple is in phase with the ROS oscillation. In contrast, the ATP concentration is almost constant at 3.2 mM [Fig. 2(e)]. ΓH2O2,ex of 3.0 × 103 μM/s is continuously provided to the system after t = 15 min. The oscillatory dynamics of H2O2, O2 and NADH are clearly changed owing to the ΓH2O2,ex onset. The cyclic period is shortened by about half and the dynamic range (between the maximum and minimum values) of the oscillating amplitude is reduced. Despite this modulation of the rhythm and shape, the steady oscillating behaviour is maintained, suggesting that the regulating activity still works against ΓH2O2,ex perturbation. Figure 2(f)–(j) show the species concentrations at a slightly higher ΓH2O2,ex of 3.5 × 103 μM/s. After starting H2O2 application, the dynamics of ROS and NADH gradually switch from the oscillatory to nonoscillatory (stationary) state within 5–10 min. As a result of the oscillatory–stationary transition, the average concentrations of ROS and NADH slightly decrease. At ΓH2O2 higher than the critical value of 3.5 × 103 μM/s, the oscillating behaviour settles to the stationary state immediately after the H2O2 onset. At an excessive high ΓH2O2,ex of 0.1 μM/s, the concentration of ROS particularly H2O2 markedly increases, whereas the NADH concentration decreases, i.e., the NAD redox moves from the NADH to NAD+ side [Fig. 2(k)–(o)]. This phenomenon indicates that the ROS regulation activity is overloaded; as a result, redox homeostasis cannot be maintained any more against the excessive CAP-induced perturbation. On the other hand, the ATP concentration is essentially unchanged with time at all values of ΓH2O2,ex [Fig. 2(e,j,o)].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Time courses of the concentrations of intramitochondrial biochemical agents. (b,g,l) H2O2; (c,h,m) O2; (d,i,n) NADH; and (e,j,o) ATP obtained under the ΓH2O2,ex conditions of (ae) 0.0 μM/s at t = 0–15 min and 3.0 × 103 μM/s at t = 15–30 min, (fj) 3.5 × 103 μM/s at t = 15–30 min and (ko) 0.1 μM/s at t = 15–30 min. All results are obtained at Δψ of 150 mV.

Figure 3 shows the time series of the reaction rates of the most relevant pathways involved in the unique dynamics in Fig. 2, from which the reaction scheme among molecular oxygen, peroxidase, enzyme intermediates, NAD (NADH/NAD+), ROS and ΓH2O2,ex can be understood. For details of the reaction scheme, see Supplementary Table S1. Figure 3(a) shows the results obtained without ΓH2O2,ex; the rates of the superoxide dismutase (SOD) reaction (R19) the peroxidase H2O2 detox reaction (R14) and the peroxidase O2 detox reaction (R18) greatly fluctuate with a cycle period of about 5 min. The reaction rates reach a peak of about 1 μM/s. H2O2 and O2 are formed as intermediates during the respiration reaction (R12)33,34. It is seen from Fig. 3(b) that the redox transition from NADH to NAD+ is predominantly governed by the respiration reaction (R12), which is constant with time, in contrast to R13 and R17. These minor reactions among the electron donors, H2O2 and O2 fluctuate similarly to the other oscillating reactions in Fig. 3(a). Figure 3(c,f) indicate that the oscillation of R14 is boosted upward from a low ΓH2O2,ex. With increasing ΓH2O2,ex to 3.0 × 103 and 3.5 × 103 μM/s, the reaction dynamics markedly change. Not only R14 but also R13, R17, R18 and R19 are influenced by the ΓH2O2,ex onset. The dynamic ranges of these oscillations are shrunk and the synchronised cycle period is shortened. Finally, the oscillation is damped to a nonoscillatory state [Fig. 3(e,f)]. As shown in Fig. 3(e), the rate of the H2O2 detox reaction (R14) stops fluctuating in several minutes then remains at 4.0 × 103 μM/s, which is very close to the ΓH2O2,ex of 3.5 × 103 μM/s. The average rate of R14 decreases to 25% of that obtained without ΓH2O2,ex. These results suggest that the peroxidase reaction (R14) plays a key role in defence against H2O2. When excessive H2O2,ex is added, the balance of ROS regulation is lost; all the reactions listed here immediately settle in the stationary state [Fig. 3(g,h)].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Time series of the reaction rates of the most relevant pathways in the ROS regulation system, (a,b) without ΓH2O2,ex. (c,d) With ΓH2O2,ex of 3.0 × 103 μM/s. (e,f) With ΓH2O2,ex of 3.5 × 103 μM/s. (g,h) With ΓH2O2,ex of 0.1 μM/s. Δψ is fixed at 150 mV. The H2O2 onset is at t = 0 s.

Figure 4 quantitatively shows the effect of ΓH2O2,ex on H2O2 and O2 stability at Δψ of 150 mV. Both H2O2 and O2 have the same oscillatory cycle. The period is about 5 min, which is almost constant against the ΓH2O2,ex variation below about 104 μM/s [Fig. 4(a)]. Under such low ΓH2O2,ex conditions, the dynamic range and average concentration of steady ROS oscillations are essentially unchanged [Fig. 4(b,c)]. The rhythm and shape of ROS oscillation remain constant against the perturbation. This finding indicates that ROS homeostasis is satisfactorily maintained. With increasing ΓH2O2,ex to 3.0 × 103 μM/s, the cycle period gradually decreases from 5 min to approximately 3 min (i.e., the cycle frequency is increasing) and the dynamic range of ROS fluctuation is slightly shrunk (less than 1% reduction). The ROS regulation activity is still efficient at this stage. When ΓH2O2,ex rises further and exceeds the critical value of 3.5 × 103 μM/s (also referred to as the threshold value ΓH2O2,exth), the ROS oscillates much faster with smaller amplitudes, then fades away with time; the behaviour switches from the oscillatory to stationary state. In this transient phase, the oscillatory and stationary states coexist, i.e., bistability appears in the ROS regulation system. Because ROS stop oscillating [Fig. 4(b,c)], the cycle period cannot be defined (it decreases to zero in Fig. 4(a)). Once the system collapses, it settles in the stationary state at higher ΓH2O2 values up to 1.0 μM/s. At this stage, the regulation mechanism cannot defend mitochondria against an excessively high ΓH2O2,ex. As shown in the high-ΓH2O2,ex region in Fig. 4(b,c), the intramitochondrial H2O2 and O2 concentrations linearly increase with increasing ΓH2O2,ex. Figure 4(d) shows the time differential of H2O2 oscillation (d[H2O2]/dt) obtained without ΓH2O2,ex. d[H2O2]/dt (positive) corresponds to the inherent intramitochondrial H2O2 production rate under physiological conditions. The peak d[H2O2]/dt is 3.0 × 103 μM/s, which is very close to the threshold ΓH2O2,exth for the state transition. This result clearly indicates that the maintenance of redox regulation is predominantly determined by the balance between ΓH2O2,exth and intrinsic intramitochondrial ROS dynamics.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) Oscillatory cycle period of ROS (H2O2 and O2) and the concentrations of (b) H2O2 and (c) O2 as a function of ΓH2O2,ex. (d) Time differential of H2O2 oscillation in concentration (d[H2O2]/dt) without ΓH2O2,ex. The results are obtained at Δψ of 150 mV.

RNS affects energy metabolism

The effects of RNS on mitochondrial activity through the RC system is modelled with focus on the Δψ variation, which is directly associated with the adenine nucleotide translocator (ANT) function16,35. Figure 5 shows the influences of Δψ and ΓH2O2,ex on the energy metabolism and redox regulation. As shown in the period of t = 0–30 min in Fig. 5(a)–(e), the behaviour of ROS as well as that of NADH is little affected by the Δψ reduction from 150 to 130 mV. In contrast, the Δψ reduction markedly decreases the ATP concentration from 3.2 to 1.0 mM (150  130 mV). The ΓH2O2,ex onset under the low Δψ condition (t = 30–45 min) switches the H2O2 behaviour from oscillatory to nonoscillatory. As expected from the previous subsection, the O2 concentration also decreases to the stationary state together with the H2O2 concentration. Figure 5(f)–(j) show that the Δψ increase from 150 to 170 mV after t = 15 min increases the ATP concentration from 3.2 to 3.7 mM. At the same time, the NADH concentration steeply increases fourfold (150170 mV). Since the change in NADH concentration occurs not only in the TCA cycle but also in the ROS regulation system, it triggers the modulation of the H2O2 dynamics even without the external H2O2 onset. The cyclic periods and fluctuating amplitudes of H2O2 decrease [t = 15–30 min in Fig. 5(c)]. Then, in the period of 30–45 min, the onset of ΓH2O2,ex of 2.5 × 103 μM/s further changes their oscillatory dynamics; strong fluctuation–damping toward the stationary state occurs.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Time series of (a) Δψ from 150 mV (t = 0–15 min) to 130 mV (t = 15–45 min) (solid line) and from 170 mV to 130 mV (broken line), (b) ΓH2O2,ex from 0 (t = 0–30 min) to 3.3 × 103 μM/s (t = 30–45 min), (c) H2O2 concentration, (d) NADH concentration and (e) ATP concentration. Time series of (f) Δψ from 150 mV (t = 0–15 min) to 170 mV (t = 15–45 min) (solid line) and from 130 mV to 170 mV (broken line), (g) ΓH2O2,ex values from 0 (t = 0–30 min) to 2.5 × 103 μM/s (t = 30–45 min), (h) H2O2 concentration, (i) NADH concentration and (j) ATP concentration.

To determine the effects of Δψ, a bar chart of the average concentrations of major mitochondrial agents at different Δψ is shown in Fig. 6. Pyruvate (Pyr), oxaloacetate (OAA), α-ketoglutarate (KG), citrate (Cit), acetyl-CoA (AcCoA), ADP and ATP are involved in the TCA cycle and RC, ferrous peroxidase iron(II) (Fe2+), ferric peroxidase iron(III) (Fe3+), enzyme intermediate compounds I, II and III (coI, coII and coIII, respectively), O2, O2 and H2O2 are involved in the ROS regulation system, and NAD+ and NADH link these systems. This result is obtained without ΓH2O2,ex. However, note that the concentration profiles listed here are little influenced by ΓH2O2,ex of less than the bistability transient threshold value. Figure 7 shows the influences of Δψ on membrane reactions: (a) ATP concentration and ATP/ADP ratio and (b) the rates of major reactions, νANT, νATP, νResp and νLeak. It also shows the effects of Δψ on the TCA cycle: (c) NADH concentration and NAD+/NADH ratio and (d) AcCoA and KG concentrations and OAA/Cit ratio. The ATP/ADP ratio is a major indicator of energy metabolic performance. The NAD+/NADH ratio represents the NAD redox activity. The OAA/Cit ratio is an index of the stimulation of NAD-linked dehydrogenases of TCA cycle36. For details of the reaction scheme, see Supplementary Table S1.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Bar chart of the concentrations of major mitochondrial agents at Δψ of 130, 150 and 170 mV without ΓH2O2,ex. The mitochondrial agents from Pyr to NADH are involved in the TCA cycle, those from NAD+ to H2O2 in the ROS regulation system and those from ADP to NADH in the RC system.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Influences of Δψ on membrane reactions: (a) ATP concentration and ATP/ADP ratio and (b) rates of major reactions, νANT, νATP, νResp and νLeak. Influences of Δψ on TCA cycle: (c) NADH concentration and NAD+/NADH ratio, and (d) AcCoA and KG concentrations and OAA/Cit ratio. These results are obtained without ΓH2O2,ex. The concentrations and rates are time-averaged for fluctuating values.

The key factor to understanding these results is the membrane reaction of RC involving the ATPADP exchange, NAD transfer and their association with Δψ variation. Figures 6 and 7(a,b) show that the ATP concentration decreases from 3.7 to 1.0 mM, whereas the ADP concentration increases from 0.4 to 3.1 mM with decreasing Δψ from 170 to 130 mV in the RC system, because νANT, which promotes the ATPADP exchange (R09), is enhanced from 0.1 to 2.9 mM/s. νATP (R11: oxidative phosphorylation to generate ATP) is a competitive pathway for producing ATP and consuming ADP. The rate balance between νANT (R09) and νATP (R11) predominantly determines the ATP and ADP concentrations [Fig. 7(b)]. Since Δψ reduction corresponds to the degradation of proton pump efficiency, the ADP concentration is enhanced rather than ATP concentration at a low Δψ [Fig. 6]. The increase in the respiration rate (νResp, R12) from 0.05 to 0.12 mM/s was induced by stimulating RC [Fig. 7(b)]. Figures 6 and 7(b,c) show that a high νResp at a low Δψ favours the NADHNAD+ transformation; therefore, the NADH concentration is kept low (about 0.1 mM) at 130–145 mV. The NAD transformation tightly links the TCA and RC functions. The NADH concentration steeply increases at Δψ over 150 mV then reaches about 0.45 mM at 170 mV. This reaction is accompanied by the significant consumption of AcCoA; the AcCoA concentration is reduced from 0.22 mM (130 mV) to 0.10 mM (140 mV) and 0.04 mM (170 mV) (see Fig. 7(d)). On the other hand, KG increases with increasing Δψ from 0.12 mM (130 mV) to 0.48 mM (170 mV). OAA also changes similarly to KG. The OAA/Cit ratio declines from 0.013–0.014 at Δψ of 150–170 mV to 0.004 at 130 mV. The mitochondrial membrane potential Δψ is not only critical for maintaining the physiological function of RC to generate ATP but also affects the NAD redox transformation and, therefore, ROS regulation activity. As shown in Fig. 6, the time-averaged concentrations of Fe2+, Fe3+, coI, coII and coIII change with Δψ. The time-averaged concentration of H2O2 decreases from 9.3 × 106 to 2.8 × 106 μM with increasing Δψ from 130 to 170 mV. The O2 concentration also slightly decreases.

Figure 8 shows the behaviour of the ROS regulation system at different ΓH2O2,ex and Δψ. The results allow us to examine the synergetic effects of ΓH2O2,ex (caused by ROS) and Δψ (caused by RNS) on the dynamics of mitochondrial activity. As shown in Fig. 8(a), the oscillating cycle period of ROS (H2O2 and O2) without ΓH2O2,ex is kept at 5–6 min for Δψ of 130–150 mV (see also Fig. 5(c)). The TCA cycle and membrane reactions remain essentially the same across the Δψ variation [Figs. 5(d), 6 and 7(c)] at this stage, whereas the cycle period decreases to approximately 2 min for Δψ over 150 mV. This trend is caused by the enhancement of NAD redox (NADH increase and NAD+ reduction) [Fig. 5(i)], which affects the ROS regulation system. Figure 8(b) shows that the threshold ΓH2O2,exth, at which the transition from the oscillating to nonoscillating state occurs, only slightly decreases from 3.5 × 103 to 2.0 × 103 μM/s with increasing Δψ from 130 to 170 mV. This observation suggests that the H2O2 onset has a more dominant effect on triggering the transient bistability than Δψ.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Influences of Δψ and ΓH2O2,ex on ROS regulation system, (a) oscillatory cycle period of ROS (H2O2 and O2) as a function of Δψ without ΓH2O2,ex and (b) ROS cycle as a function of ΓH2O2,ex for different Δψ (a merged view is shown to focus on the threshold of transition from oscillatory to stationary state). Trajectories of H2O2 and O2 concentrations for Δψ of 130, 150 and 170 mV and different ΓH2O2,ex, (c) without ΓH2O2,ex, (d) with ΓH2O2,ex at 2.0 × 103 μM/s, (c) at the bistability threshold ΓH2O2,exth and (d) over the threshold ΓH2O2,exth.

Figure 8(c)–(f) show the dynamical relationship between H2O2 and O2 concentrations at different ΓH2O2,ex and Δψ. Trajectories are plotted by collecting the time-evolving concentrations of H2O2 and O2. The correlation between H2O2 and O2 concentration dynamics can be understood from the shape of trajectories in the state space. Without the external perturbation of H2O2 concentration, the H2O2–O2 trajectory steadily rotates along a deformed circle [Fig. 8(c)]. The trajectories at Δψ of 130 and 150 mV are very similar, whereas the area surrounded by the trajectory at Δψ of 170 mV is rather small. With ΓH2O2,ex increasing to 2.0 × 103 μM/s, the surrounded areas are shrunk, particularly at high Δψ [Fig. 8(d)]. As shown in Fig. 8(e), when ΓH2O2,ex approaches the bistability threshold and beyond, the trajectories tend to remain in a narrow area and further converge toward a point (i.e., converge to the nonoscillatory state). At a much higher ΓH2O2,ex, the trajectory leaves its original orbit with a marked increase in the concentration of H2O2 independent of Δψ [Fig. 8(f)].

Discussion

The first half of this paper focused on the intramitochondrial H2O2 dynamics and emphasised how the rhythm was modified by CAP-originating H2O2. The range of extracellular and intracellular ROS concentrations and the related transport phenomenon across biomembranes (diffusion) have been extensively investigated3742. Most works have shown that the extracellular H2O2 concentration was in the range of 101–100 μM3739 under homeostatic physiological conditions. The intracellular physiological H2O2 concentrations have been measured to be between 103 and 101 μM38. The gradient of the H2O2 concentration between the extracellular and intracellular (cytosol) components has been estimated to be about 7-fold40, 20-fold39, 100-fold38 or 650-fold41. It has also been reported that externally provided H2O2 permeates rapidly across biomembranes42. This ROS diffusion is controlled by mitochondrial permeability transition pores (MPTPs) and inner membrane anion channels as well as Δψ variation. The gradient across the mitochondrial membrane has been assumed to be smaller than the gradient between the extracellular and intracellular components40. Thus, the present numerical results showing that the intramitochondrial H2O2 concentration fluctuates in the range of 105–101 μM (102 μM on average; Figs. 2, 4(b), 5(c,h), 6 and 8(c)) are plausible taking into consideration the 100 μM concentration for extracellular H2O2, the 100-fold gradient for cellular membranes and the 10-fold gradient for mitochondrial membranes.

As shown in Fig. 2, the concentrations of H2O2 and O2 oscillate with a cycle period of several min to maintain the inherent redox balance without CAP-induced perturbations. Biochemical oscillations occur in metabolic networks as a result of various modes of cellular regulation43. The oscillatory dynamics of ROS is considered to be essential when ROS function as secondary messengers in cell signalling processes The characteristic oscillating cycle period numerically simulated here is approximately 5 min or less [Figs. 2, 3, 4(a), 5 and 8(a,b)], which quantitatively agrees with the experimentally reported intracellular oscillatory periods of half a minute to several minutes34,44,45.

The present simulation clarified that the H2O2 influx disturbed the redox homeostasis by changing the ROS oscillatory rhythm [Figs. 2, 4, 5 and 8]. With the greater effects of ΓH2O2, the oscillatory cycle period was shortened; ultimately, the mitochondrial ROS defence system collapsed owing to excessive H2O2-induced stress. The ROS regulation system cannot overcome the disturbance completely, resulting in ROS oscillation being considerably modified, then fading out to settle in the stationary state. It has been experimentally shown that metabolic oscillations involving peroxidase–oxidase reactions could be affected by external chemical disturbances45. The transient bistability is often found in biological systems33,43. The model revealed that a key factor of the transient bistability was the balance between ΓH2O2,ex and intrinsic H2O2 dynamics and quantified that the critical ΓH2O2,ex was comparable to the maximum intramitochondrial H2O2 formation rate (the positive peak value of d[H2O2]/dt), that is, on the order of 103 μM/s [Fig. 4]. This value quantitatively agrees with the experimentally obtained H2O2 production rate of 103 μM/s37.

The above-mentioned effects occur directly as a result of interactions between CAP-induced ROS generation and cells. In the second half of this paper, the change in transmembrane permeability induced by RNS is modelled as a secondary response to other CAP-induced stimuli. Furthermore, synergetic effects of ROS and RNS provided simultaneously are examined. Nitric oxide radicals rapidly react with O2 to produce an extremely strong and reactive oxidizing agent, ONOO. RNS, particularly ONOO, freely penetrates mitochondrial membranes46 and acts on ANT in the permeability transition pore complex of MPTPs. The ANT promotes the ATPADP exchange across the inner membrane accompanied by a concomitant change in Δψ15,16,35. Excessive inhibition of mitochondrial respiration by RNS results in the opening of MPTPs, which leads to the degradation of Δψ. To avoid complexity in modelling the mechanism of RNS interactions with MPTPs, the present calculation employed the formula for ANT reactions and used Δψ as a numerical parameter35 without quantitative arguments on intramitochondrial RNS concentration.

Mitochondrial respiration and ATP synthesis are not only regulated via the linked pathways of energy metabolism but also directly controlled by the NAD+/NADH ratio and oxygen concentration36. As indicated by the reactions in Fig. 3(b,d,f,h), NAD is closely linked with ROS and intermediates of the peroxidase reaction system33,34,37,45. Figure 9 shows the topology of the present biochemical network, to which graph theory is applied to analyse the network centrality47. A directed graph consists of nodes representing species in reactions with its betweenness centrality as the circle size and edges starting from sources and ending at products of each reaction. The betweenness centrality is defined as the ratio of the number of shortest directed paths passing through a given node to that of all the directed shortest paths. The betweenness centrality represents the importance of roles as intermediates bridging between sources and products directly or indirectly. The species are categorised roughly in two groups; agents mainly functioning the TCA cycle and the membrane (upper area of Fig. 9) and agents in the ROS regulation system (lower area of Fig. 9). NADH and NAD+ are located between them and take high betweenness centrality values (their node sizes are largest), indicating that they are the most influential and consolidate the entire network. It is confirmed by network analysis that the model topology is consistent with the fact that the cellular redox state, especially the NAD redox state, is a primary control site in numerous biological processes.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Directed graph of the present biochemical reaction network. Nodes represent species in chemical reactions with its betweenness centrality value as the circle size. Edges start from sources and end at the products of each reaction. The CAP influences are indicated as external edges.

As predicted using the network topology [Fig. 9], the numerical results showed that Δψ is affected by the membrane RC reaction, the TAC cycle and the ROS regution system [Figs. 5, 6, 7 and 8]. Furthermore, as discussed already, the system behaviour is significantly influenced by ΓH2O2,ex. The key agent bridging them is NAD. Figures 5, 6, 7 and 8 show how the concentrations and dynamics of agents and relevant reaction probabilities changed with Δψ as well as with ΓH2O2,ex. Δψ has been assessed for many years. Most works have estimated that Δψ is typically in the range of 100–200 mV under physiological conditions5,36,48. The present Δψ in the range of 130–170 mV is within this physiological range. Figures 5, 6 and 7 indicate that a low Δψ decreases the ATP concentration and ATP/ADP ratio, resulting in a significant deterioration of energy metabolism. In contrast, a high ATP concentration and a high ATP/ADP ratio at Δψ of over 150 mV would lead to the release of ATP from the cell through ion channels. Figure 7(c) shows that the decrease in Δψ promoted NADH oxidation, i.e., the NADH concentration declined and the NAD+/NADH ratio increased. It has been experimentally shown that an increase in the NAD+/NADH ratio from 0.01 to 10 decreased ROS production activity under the NADH concentration of approximately 0.5 mM49. The NAD+/NADH ratio and NADH concentration in Fig. 7(c) are in agreement with the reported values. Figure 7(d) implies that the increased TCA cycle activity lowers the AcCoA concentration, which is also consistent with previous observations36.

It has been experimentally demonstrated that CAP irradiation induced the change in mitochondrial transmembrane permeability12,17. Some works have shown that CAPs decreased Δψ and increased the intracellular Ca2+ level12 and others suggested that CAP irradiation induced stress-dependent ATP release17. These CAP-induced intracellular reactions seem to result either in cell survival or death. The ROS dynamics shown in Fig. 8 may provide an explanation for the cell fate decisions. The ROS oscillatory dynamics was changed with ΓH2O2,ex and Δψ owing to the activation of NADH-supported ROS formation via the RC system [Fig. 8(a,b)]. With the greater effects of ΓH2O2 and Δψ, the plot of the ROS passage changed from simple periodic oscillation to damped oscillation [Fig. 8(c,d)]. In a cell, the natural rhythm of NAD redox and ROS regulation was impaired. When a negatively regulated state (inherent homeostasis) turned into an irreversible state, overall cell functions were disrupted [Fig. 8(e,f)]. The CAP-originating RONS could synergetically manipulate critical cell functions and affect cell fate decisions.

Conclusion

The biochemical modelling and numerical simulation quantitatively clarified for the first time how cold atmospheric plasmas affect cell fate decisions by controlling the mitochondrial redox homeostasis and energy metabolism. The CAP-originating ROS and RNS synergetically affected the activities in the TCA cycle and oxidative phosphorylation involving the RC, the ATP synthesis machinery and the ROS regulation system in mitochondria. In particular, RONS stimuli crucially affected the behaviour of ROS oscillation, NAD redox and ATP to ADP conversion. One of the important quantitative findings was that the key factor for the change from cellular homeostasis to irreversibility was the balance between the CAP-induced H2O2 influx and the intrinsic intramitochondrial H2O2 dynamics. Furthermore, it was clearly demonstrated that the RNS-driven change in transmembrane permeability controlled the redox regulation system and ATP/ADP metabolism through NAD-mediated reactions. Such an interplay of CAP-originating RONS with mitochondrial functions may affect not only a single cell function but also further cell–cell interactions. The proposed computational approach is expected to make a strong contribution to the fundamental understanding of the biophysics of CAP–cell interactions by unravelling potentially synergetic effects between multiple agents, which may affect intracellular dynamics in other contexts. The CAP-induced mechanism described in this paper is likely to be a widely applicable principle on how cells achieve homeostasis or lose control of their functions against externally imposed disturbances.

Computational Methods

A time-dependent zero-dimensional model for mitochondrial functions is developed on the basis of previously published works3335,37,44,45,48. The biochemical reaction set treated here mainly consists of pyruvic acid oxidation, the TCA cycle, membrane reactions and peroxidase–oxidase reactions as a cellular ROS regulation function. The model is essentially built up through a combination of two different models developed in previous works33,35. 26 elementary reactions among 26 biochemical agents are considered. The reaction pathways and the related rate constants are shown in Supplementary Table S1. The list of agents, their abbreviations and initial and/or boundary conditions are shown in Supplementary Table S2. This is a simplified model. For instance, although the mitochondrial respiratory chain includes transmembrane complexes I–IV in reality, these functions are assembled in the rate νResp f([NADH], Δψ) for reaction R12 in this model35. An expansion of reaction set to examine membrane-bounded complexes and an increase in agent number involving some common biochemical species, e.g. Ca2+, K+, Flavin mononucleotide, Flavin adenine dinucleotide, ubiquinone or cytochrome are the most important aspects of future work. BioModels Database (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/) is used to develop the computational codes. Numerical simulations are conducted using Systems Biology Workbench-compliant supporting Systems Biology Markup Language format (http://sbml.org/) together with CellDesigner (http://www.celldesigner.org/). The rate equation governing the reaction kinetics can be expressed as dni/dt=nijkijnj+nijmkijmnjnm+Rex, where ni, kij, kijm and Rex denote the concentration of the ith species, the two-body reaction rate for the i and jth species, the three-body reaction rate for the i, j and mth species and the external rate source term, respectively. The numerical code solves the differential equation system using Gillespie’s direct method, which is a stochastic simulation algorithm50. For details of the numerical scheme, see the literature33,35. The CAP influences (the ΓH2O2,ex infusion and Δψ change) are added to steady-state or periodic-state solutions obtained for a time series of 10000 s for given initial conditions. The range of the ΓH2O2,ex infusion is 0–1.0 μM/s (constant in time). Δψ (constant in time) is set in the range of 130 mV (de-polarization) – 150 mV (steady state polarization) – 170 mV (hyper-polarization). The time step of 1.0 s is sufficiently shorter than the characteristic time of macroscopic behaviour of mitochondrial agents on which the present model focuses.

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) Grant Number 16K04998 and 19K03813.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-53219-w.

References

  • 1.Trachootham D, Lu W, Ogasawara MA, Valle NR-D, Huang P. Redox regulation of cell survival. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2008;10:1343–1374. doi: 10.1089/ars.2007.1957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Daiber A. Redox signaling (cross-talk) from and to mitochondria involves mitochondrial pores and reactive oxygen species. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2010;1797:897–906. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.01.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brand MD. Mitochondrial generation of superoxide and hydrogenperoxide as the source of mitochondrial redox signaling. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2016;100:14–31. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bratic I, Trifunovic A. Mitochondrial energy metabolism and ageing. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2010;1797:961–967. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Duchen MR. Mitochondria in health and disease: perspectives on a new mitochondrial biology. Mol. Aspects Med. 2004;25:365–451. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2004.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ikehara Y, Sakakita H, Shimizu N, Ikehara S, Nakanishi H. Formation of membrane-like structures in clotted blood by mild plasma treatment during hemostasis. J. Photopolymer Sci. Technol. 2013;25:555–557. doi: 10.2494/photopolymer.26.555. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Flynn PB, et al. Non-thermal plasma exposure rapidly attenuates bacterial AHL-dependent quorum sensing and virulence. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:26320. doi: 10.1038/srep26320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sakudo A, Toyokawa Y, Imanishi Y, Murakami T. Crucial roles of reactive chemical species in modification of respiratory syncytial virus by nitrogen gas plasma. Materials Sci. Eng. C. 2017;74:131–136. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Keidar M. Plasma for cancer treatment. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2015;24:033001. doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/24/3/033001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hirst AM, et al. Low temperature plasmas as emerging cancer therapeutics: the state of play and thoughts for the future. Tumor Biol. 2016;37:7021–7031. doi: 10.1007/s13277-016-4911-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yan D, et al. The strong cell-based hydrogen peroxide generation triggered by cold atmospheric plasma. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:10831. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11480-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sasaki S, Kanzaki M, Kaneko T. Calcium influx through TRP channels induced by short-lived reactive species in plasma-irradiated solution. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:25728. doi: 10.1038/srep25728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Iuchi K, et al. Cold atmospheric-pressure nitrogen plasma induces the production of reactive nitrogen species and cell death by increasing intracellular calcium in HEK293T cells. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2018;654:136–145. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2018.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lin A, et al. Nonequilibrium dielectric barrier discharge treatment of mesenchymal stem cells: charges and reactive oxygen species play the major role in cell death. Plasma Proc. Polymers. 2015;12:1117–1127. doi: 10.1002/ppap.201400232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim PK, Zamora R, Petrosko P, Billiar TR. The regulatory role of nitric oxide in apoptosis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2001;1:1421–1441. doi: 10.1016/S1567-5769(01)00088-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vieira HLA, et al. The adenine nucleotide translocator: a target of nitric oxide, peroxynitrite, and 4-hydroxynonenal. Oncogene. 2001;20:4305–4316. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Truong B, Siegert KJ, Krebs FC. Apical application of nanosecond-pulsed dielectric barrier discharge plasma causes the basolateral release of adenosine triphosphate as a damage-associated molecular pattern from polarized HaCaT cells. Plasma Med. 2017;7:117–131. doi: 10.1615/PlasmaMed.2017019120. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dezest M, et al. Mechanistic insights into the impact of Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma on human epithelial cell lines. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:41163. doi: 10.1038/srep41163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lu X, et al. Reactive species in non-equilibrium atmospheric-pressure plasmas: generation, transport and biological effects. Phys. Rep. 2016;630:1–84. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.03.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Murakami T, Niemi K, Gans T, O’Connell D, Graham WG. Chemical kinetics and reactive species in atmospheric pressure helium-oxygen plasmas with humid-air impurities. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2013;22:015003. doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/22/1/015003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Murakami T, Niemi K, Gans T, O’Connell D, Graham WG. Interacting kinetics of neutral and ionic species in an atmospheric-pressure helium-oxygen plasma with humid air impurities. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2013;22:045010. doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/22/4/045010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Murakami T, Niemi K, Gans T, O’Connell D, Graham WG. Afterglow chemistry of atmospheric-pressure helium-oxygen plasmas with humid air impurity. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2014;23:025005. doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/23/2/025005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kelly S, Turner MM. Generation of reactive species by an atmospheric pressure plasma jet. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2014;23:065013. doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/23/6/065013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Locke BR, Thagard SM. Analysis and review of chemical reactions and transport processes in pulsed electrical discharge plasma formed directly in liquid water. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2012;32:875–917. doi: 10.1007/s11090-012-9403-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lukes P, Dolezalova E, Sisrova I, Clupek M. Aqueous-phase chemistry and bactericidal effects from an air discharge plasma in contact with water: evidence for the formation of peroxynitrite through a pseudo-second-order post-discharge reaction of H_2O_2 and HNO_2. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2014;23:015019. doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/23/1/015019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tian W, Tachibana K, Kushner MJ. Plasmas sustained in bubbles in water: optical emission and excitation mechanisms. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2014;47:055202. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/47/5/055202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lindsay A, Anderson C, Slikboer E, Shannon S, Graves DB. Momentum, heat, and neutral mass transport in convective atmospheric pressure plasma-liquid systems and implications for aqueous targets. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2015;48:424007. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/48/42/424007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Orazov M, Sakiyama Y, Graves DB. Wound healing modeling: investigating ambient gas plasma treatment efficiency. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2012;45:445201. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/45/44/445201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gils CAJV, Hofmann S, Boekema BKHL, Brandenburg R, Bruggeman PJ. Mechanisms of bacterial inactivation in the liquid phase induced by a remote RF cold atmospheric pressure plasma jet. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2013;46:175203. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/46/17/175203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Norberg SA, Tian W, Johnsen E, Kushner MJ. Atmospheric pressure plasma jets interacting with liquid covered tissue: touching and not-touching the liquid. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2014;47:475203. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/47/47/475203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Uchida S, Yoshida T, Tochikubo F. Numerical simulation of physicochemical interactions between oxygen atom and phosphatidylcholine due to direct irradiation of atmospheric pressure nonequilibrium plasma to biological membrane with quantum mechanical molecular dynamics. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2017;50:395203. doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aa84ee. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lackmann JW, et al. Chemical fingerprints of cold physical plasmas–an experimental and computational study using cysteine as tracer compound. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:7736. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25937-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Olsen LF, Hauser MJB, Kummer U. Mechanism of protection of peroxidase activity by oscillatory dynamics. Eur. J. Biochem. 2003;270:2796–2804. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03655.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Scheeline A, et al. The peroxidase-oxidase oscillator and its constituent chemistries. Chem. Rev. 1997;97:739–756. doi: 10.1021/cr960081a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nazaret C, Heiske M, Thurley K, Mazat JP. Mitohondrial energetic metabolism: A simplified model of TCA cycle with ATP production. J. Theor. Biol. 2009;258:455–464. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.09.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Brown GC. Control of respiration and ATP synthesis in mammalian mitochondria and cells. Biochem. J. 1992;15:1–13. doi: 10.1042/bj2840001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chance B, Sies H, Boveris A. Hydroperoxide metabolism in mammalian organs. Physiol. Rev. 1979;59:527–605. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1979.59.3.527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sies H. Hydrogen peroxide as a central redox signaling molecule in physiological oxidative stress: Oxidative eustress. Redox Biol. 2017;11:613–619. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2016.12.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Antunes F, Britob PM. Quantitative biology of hydrogen peroxide signaling. Redox Biol. 2017;13:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2017.04.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Antunes F, Cadenas E. Estimation of H_2O_2 gradients across biomembranes. FEBS Lett. 2000;475:121–126. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01638-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Huang BK, Sikes HD. Quantifying intracellular hydrogen peroxide perturbations in terms of concentration. Redox Biol. 2014;2:955–962. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2014.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bienert GP, Schjoerring JK, Jahn TP. Membrane transport of hydrogen peroxide. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2006;1758:994–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Goldbeter A. Computational approaches to cellular rhythms. Nature. 2002;420:238–245. doi: 10.1038/nature01259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hauser MJB, Kummer U, Larsen AZ, Olsen LF. Oscillatory dynamics protect enzymes and possibly cells against toxic substances. Faraday Discuss. 2001;120:215–227. doi: 10.1039/b103076k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wang H, Cai R-X, Lin Z. Study and application of perturbation of peroxynitrite on peroxidase-oxidase oscillation. Talanta. 2006;69:509–514. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2005.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Curtin JF, Donovan M, Cotter TG. Regulation and measurement of oxidative stress in apoptosis. J. Immunol. Methods. 2002;265:49–72. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1759(02)00070-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mizui Y, Kojima T, Miyagi S, Sakai O. Graphical classification in multi-centrality-index diagrams for complex chemical networks. Symmetry. 2017;9:309. doi: 10.3390/sym9120309. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Beard DA. A biophysical model of the mitochondrial respiratory system and oxidative phosphorylation. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2005;1:e36. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Grivennikova VG, Vinogradov AD. Partitioning of superoxide and hydrogen peroxide production by mitochondrial respiratory complex I. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2013;1827:446–454. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gillespie DT. A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions. J. Comp. Phys. 1976;22:403–434. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(76)90041-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES