Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 7.
Published in final edited form as: Soft Matter. 2019 Oct 31;15(45):9271–9286. doi: 10.1039/c9sm01653h

Table 3.

Report of the statistical significance (p-value) of the individual energy components between different types of NPs in Fig. 5 as a function of membrane excess areas

Aex = 6% Aex = 20%
Free energy
Rigid vs. rigid-tethered 8.3 × 10−5 0.0008
Rigid vs. flexible 0.001 4.8 × 10−6
Rigid-tethered vs. flexible 0.003 7.4 × 10−5
Entropy
Rigid vs. rigid-tethered 0.002 0.0002
Rigid vs. flexible 3.9 × 10−5 3.2 × 10−5
Rigid-tethered vs. flexible 0.001 0.0007
Enthalpy
Rigid vs. rigid-tethered 8.28 × 10−5 0.0008
Rigid vs. flexible 0.001 4.8 × 10−6
Rigid-tethered vs. flexible 0.003 7.4 × 10−5
Free energy per bond
Rigid vs. rigid-tethered 0.0001 0.0002
Rigid vs. flexible 0.0691 4.69 × 10−5
Rigid-tethered vs. flexible 0.005 0.0006
Entropy per bond
Rigid vs. rigid-tethered 0.81 0.5
Rigid vs. flexible 0.47 0.75
Rigid-tethered vs. flexible 0.026 0.006
Enthalpy per bond
Rigid vs. rigid-tethered 0.0001 0.0002
Rigid vs. flexible 0.069 4.86 × 10−5
Rigid-tethered vs. flexible 0.005 0.0006