ISKDC 1974.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | CPA‐prednisone group
Prednisone group
Co‐interventions
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Study described as randomised; method of randomisation not reported |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding of participants/investigators; lack of blinding could influence management |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Outcome assessment by quantitative measurement of protein on overnight urine collection or semi‐quantitative based on urinalysis Unclear how many patients had laboratory assessment of outcome |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All patients followed up |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Complete and partial remission reported but no definition for partial remission provided; adverse effects not reported specifically for steroid‐resistant patients |
Other bias | Low risk | Support from NIH AM 14490‐93, National Kidney Foundation, Kidney Foundation of New York, John Rath Foundation |