Skip to main content
. 2019 May 3;124(5):777–790. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcz061

Table 4.

Concentration (mg g–1; mean ± s.d.) of total N in dry biomass of stems, roots and leaves of five con-familiar pairs of lianas and shrubs at three annual peak-of-season harvests

Family Year n Stems Roots Leaves
Lianas Shrubs Lianas Shrubs P Lianas Shrubs P Lianas Shrubs P
Araliaceae 2014 5 2 17.48 ± 2.25 16.86 ± 0.63 ns 23.61 ± 5.40 21.53 ± 1.96 ns 21.63 ± 1.94 23.90 ± 3.38 ns
2015 5 0 15.91 ± 1.25 22.00 ± 3.85 26.95 ± 2.11
2016 8 2 14.06 ± 1.76 12.28 ± 3.87 ns 21.20 ± 2.25 23.44 ± 3.74 ns 24.41 ± 1.89 34.44 ± 2.99 ***
Caprifoliaceae 2014 5 5 14.99 ± 2.26 11.04 ± 1.18 *** 27.44 ± 2.05 19.03 ± 2.81 *** 29.84 ± 2.67 27.64 ± 2.90 ns
2015 5 3 12.91 ± 0.71 9.63 ± 1.96 ** 25.22 ± 2.49 19.11 ± 1.47 *** 27.06 ± 1.19 23.66 ± 0.92 ns
2016 7 4 12.55 ± 0.94 10.29 ± 0.46 * 20.85 ± 1.41 16.71 ± 2.61 ** 27.86 ± 2.92 23.60 ± 1.96 **
Celastraceae 2014 5 5 18.65 ± 3.64 13.22 ± 2.63 ** 21.84 ± 3.84 26.30 ± 4.41 ns 29.86 ± 3.42 26.89 ± 2.40 ns
2015 5 5 20.58 ± 2.53 14.80 ± 4.36 ** 35.27 ± 4.63 27.56 ± 3.66 ** 30.82 ± 1.92 28.82 ± 5.71 ns
2016 4 5 15.16 ± 2.04 13.83 ± 1.83 ns 28.63 ± 6.56 25.76 ± 2.18 ns 25.58 ± 3.51 25.82 ± 1.54 ns
Fabaceae 2014 5 5 20.80 ± 2.50 18.80 ± 2.21 ns 36.08 ± 5.09 25.40 ± 4.40 *** 33.16 ± 0.99 33.42 ± 3.04 ns
2015 5 5 13.96 ± 2.11 16.32 ± 1.20 ns 28.37 ± 7.45 22.76 ± 2.45 * 28.65 ± 2.91 27.72 ± 2.15 ns
2016 6 4 13.05 ± 1.45 15.81 ± 2.46 * 21.26 ± 0.89 23.31 ± 1.94 ns 24.12 ± 3.26 31.44 ± 3.29 ***
Hydrangeaceae 2015 3 3 14.61 ± 2.00 7.86 ± 1.07 *** 21.11 ± 3.83 15.16 ± 2.22 * 25.35 ± 1.13 20.83 ± 2.10 ns
2016 3 3 11.55 ± 0.83 9.36 ± 1.95 ns 22.13 ± 0.71 18.36 ± 0.55 ns 32.02 ± 1.75 24.49 ± 5.16 *

Results of Student’s t-test for significance of differences between liana and shrub means within family and season are shown: ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; ns, not significant.

Significant differences are highlighted by bold font. See Supplementary Data Table S2 for ANOVA results.