Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 23;47(21):11225–11237. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz810

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

RPA is not necessary for GFP–BLM translocation on dsDNA. (A) Kymograph showing GFP–BLM (0.2 nM; green) translocation on dsDNA (unlabeled) without RPA; buffer flow was OFF during data collection. (B) Distribution of initiation sites for GFP–BLM in the absence of RPA (N = 134). Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals calculated from bootstrap analysis. (C) Quantification of GFP–BLM translocation direction in the absence of RPA. (D) Velocity distribution of GFP–BLM translocation rates without RPA on double-tethered dsDNA. The solid blue line represents a Gaussian fit to the data. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals calculated from bootstrap analysis. (E) Survival probability plot of GFP–BLM translocation without RPA on double-tethered dsDNA. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals calculated from bootstrap analysis.