Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 11;33(9):e22994. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22994

Table 3.

Statistical comparison of autoantibodies by chi‐square test and odds ratio

  Sporadic miscarriage vs control RPL vs control RPL vs sporadic miscarriage
Chi‐square P Odds ratio (95% CI) Chi‐square P Odds ratio (95% CI) Chi‐square P Odds ratio (95% CI)
aPT IgM .018 NA .010 NA .732 ND
aPE IgG <.001 NA .004 NA .208 ND
aPE IgM .001 8.8 (2.0‐39.2) <.001 19 (4.4‐81.4) .012 2.2 (1.2‐4.0)
aEM IgG .009 9.9 (1.3‐78.0) .011 9.1 (1.2‐78.0) .834 ND
ANA .027 NA .003 NA .105 ND

Only the autoimmune antibodies with statistically significant (P < .05) differences among patient groups were listed. NA: no available odds ratio can be calculated due to the presence of a zero value (meaning no positive results for a particular autoimmune antibody). ND: odds ratio was not determined when the corresponding chi‐square P value was >.05.

Abbreviations: aEM, anti‐endometrium; ANA, anti‐nuclear antibodies; aPE, anti‐phosphotidylethanolamine; aPT, anti‐prothrombin; CI, confidence intervals; RPL, recurrent pregnancy loss.