Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 30;35(1):107–122. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22160

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Results of the ALE meta‐analysis showing significant clusters (P < 0.05, FDR‐corrected for multiple comparisons, cluster size 200 mm3) for the contrast of metaphor processing versus literal language processing. A: ALE clusters for the contrast of conventional metaphor processing versus literal processing. B: ALE clusters for the contrast of novel metaphor processing versus literal processing. C: ALE clusters for the contrast of metaphorical word processing versus literal word processing. D: ALE clusters for the contrast of metaphorical sentence processing versus literal sentence processing. E: ALE clusters for the contrast of metaphorical processing versus literal processing in valence judgment task. F: ALE clusters for the contrast of metaphorical processing versus literal processing in semantic relatedness judgment task. L = left, R = right. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com.]