Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 30;35(1):107–122. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22160

Table 1.

Overview of the 17 original fMRI studies included in the current meta‐analysis

Study Field strength Space Metaphor type Word or sentence Task Comparison Threshold Voxel Size (mm3) N
Ahrens et al. 2007 1.5 T Talairach Anomalous (novel), conventional Sentence Passive reading (press button when finished) Anomalous (novel) metaphor > literal; conventional metaphor > literal; anomalous metaphor > conventional metaphor P < 0.001, uncorrected 3 × 3 × 5 8
Bambini et al. 2011 1.5 T Talairach Novel Sentence Semantic relatedness judgments (passage‐ target word) All metaphor > literal P < 0.005, cluster size corrected for multiple comparison 5 mm thickness 9
Chen et al. 2008 3.0 T Talairach Not reported Sentence Plausibility judgment Metaphor > literal sentence P < 0.01, voxel > 40 3 × 3 × 3 14
Diaz and Hogstrom 2011 3.0 T MNI Novel, conventional Sentence Sentence judgment (related, unrelated, nonword) Metaphor > literal P < 0.01 corrected 4 × 4 × 4 16
Diaz et al. 2011 3.0 T MNI Novel, conventional Sentence Valence rating (positive, negative, neutral) Novel metaphor > nonword baseline; conventional metaphor > nonword baseline; all metaphor > literal P < 0.01, voxel > 7 4 × 4 × 4 16
Eviatar and Just 2006 3.0 T Talairach Conventional Sentence Comprehension task Metaphor > literal P < 0.01 corrected 3.125 × 3.125 × 3 16
Kircher et al. 2007 1.5 T Talairach Novel Sentence Connotation judgment (positive or negative) Metaphor > low‐level baseline; metaphor > literal P < 0.00001 (uncorrected), voxel >10 3 × 3 × 5 12
Lee and Dapretto 2006 3.0 T Talairach Conventional Word Semantic relatedness judgments Metaphor > rest; metaphor > literal P < 0.05, corrected 4 mm thickness and 1 mm gap 12
Mashal et al. 2007 1.5 T Talairach Novel, conventional Word Semantic relatedness judgments Novel metaphor > unrelated words; conventional metaphor > unrelated words; novel metaphor > literal word pairs; conventional metaphor > literal word pairs; novel metaphor > conventional metaphor P < 0.05, uncorrected (compared with unrelated words); P < 0.01, uncorrected (compared with literal word pairs) 4 mm thickness and 1 mm gap 15
Mashal et al. 2009 3.0 T Talairach Novel Sentence Connotation judgment (positive or negative) Metaphoric sentence > non‐sense sentence; Metaphoric sentence > Literal sentence P < 0.001, uncorrected 3.5 mm thickness and 0 mm gap 15
Rapp et al. 2004 1.5 T Talairach Novel Sentence Connotation judgment (positive or negative) Metaphor > low‐level baseline; metaphor > literal P < 0.05, corrected, voxel > 10, (compared with low‐level baseline); P < 0.001, corrected or uncorrected (compared with literal) 3 × 3 × 5 15
Schmidt and Seger 2009 3.0 T Talairach Novel Sentence Passive reading (when understand press button) All metaphor > non‐word sentence; all metaphor > literal; conventional metaphor > literal; familiar metaphor > unfamiliar metaphor; unfamiliar metaphor > familiar metaphor; easy metaphor > difficult metaphor; difficult metaphor > easy metaphor P < 0.001, uncorrected 5 mm thickness 10
Shibata et al. 2007 1.5 T Talairach Novel Sentence Comprehension task (understand or not) Metaphor > non‐linguistic baseline; metaphor > literal P < 0.001,uncorrected, voxel > 10 4 mm thickness and 0.8 mm gap 13
Stringaris et al. 2006 1.5 T Talairach Conventional Sentence Semantic relatedness judgments (sentence‐ target word) Metaphor > literal voxel level of P < 0.05 and cluster level of p < 0.0025 5 × 5 × 5 12
Stringaris et al. 2007 1.5 T Talairach Conventional Sentence Semantic judgment (make sense or not) Metaphor > literal P < 0.007 uncorrected 5 × 5 × 5 11
Uchiyama et al. [2012] 3.0 T MNI Not reported Sentence Coherence judgment Metaphor > literal Z > 3.09 (P < 0.05 corrected) 3 × 3 × 4 20
Yang et al. 2010 3.0 T MNI novel, conventional sentence valence task (positive or negative) novel metaphor > low‐level baseline; conventional metaphor > low‐level baseline P < 0.05, FDR corrected, voxel >10 3.44 × 3.44 × 4 12