Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 30;35(1):107–122. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22160

Table 2.

Peak activation for the contrast of conventional metaphor processing versus literal processing and the contrast of novel metaphor processing versus literal processing

Cluster Volume (mm3) Region Hemisphere BA x y z ALE value
Conventional metaphor > literal
1 200 Middle frontal gyrus L 46 −44 16 18 0.0081
Inferior frontal gyrus L 44 −46 8 18 0.0077
2 496 Inferior frontal gyrus L 47 −44 28 −4 0.0124
3 560 Inferior parietal lobule L 40 −32 −54 42 0.0093
L 40 −40 −50 40 0.0082
4 512 Middle temporal gyrus L 37 −50 −52 4 0.0126
5 912 Lingual gyrus L −26 −74 2 0.0130
Novel metaphor > literal
1 1464 Insula L 13 −34 20 8 0.0106
Middle frontal gyrus L 46 −44 28 18 0.0091
Middle frontal gyrus L 46 −46 32 14 0.0085
Inferior frontal gyrus L 47 −40 34 2 0.0086
2 1312 Middle frontal gyrus L 9 −48 18 32 0.0161
Cingulate gyrus L 32 −4 30 28 0.0085
3 352 Middle frontal gyrus L 47 −44 38 −10 0.0099
4 344 Insula L 13 −44 −40 26 0.0101
5 232 Superior frontal gyrus L 8 0 30 50 0.0089
6 384 Inferior parietal lobule L 40 −42 −48 42 0.0097
7 904 Middle temporal gyrus L 22 −54 −44 0 0.0148
8 720 Cingulate gyrus R 32 2 24 30 0.0134
9 920 Middle frontal gyrus R 46 48 22 26 0.0156
10 616 Inferior frontal gyrus R 13 40 26 14 0.0103
Insula R 13 38 18 8 0.0087
11 520 Superior temporal gyrus R 22 44 −24 4 0.0126