Table 2.
Participants | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tracing | S 1 | S 2 | S 3 | S 4 | S 5 | S 6 | S 7 | S 8 | |
Before sleep | Normal | 4.804 | 3.512 | 3.965 | 4.675 | 4.211 | 4.961 | 3.950 | 4.821 |
Mirror | 5.017 | 3.410 | 3.791 | 4.460 | 4.052 | 4.784 | 3.704 | 4.445 | |
After sleep | Normal | 4.737 | 3.810 | 4.637 | 4.842 | 4.228 | 5.101 | 4.135 | 5.254 |
Mirror | 4.508 | 3.574 | 4.508 | 4.744 | 4.344 | 5.071 | 3.888 | 4.689 | |
Post‐/Pre‐improvement | −0.121 | 0.129 | 0.330 | 0.097 | 0.074 | 0.086 | 0.094 | 0.139 |
The improvement in performance was computed by summing the log of the ratio of the performance during normal tracing after sleep and the performance of normal tracing before sleep with the log of the ratio of the performance of mirror tracing after sleep and the performance of mirror tracing before sleep, that is, log(post‐sleep normal/pre‐sleep normal) + log(post‐sleep mirror/pre‐sleep mirror).