Table 2.

Classifier performance in localizer‐based masks at the group level—crossmodal classification accuracies

mask
Modalities	Auditory	Visual	Tactile	AV	AT	VT	AVT
A–V	0.514 (ns)	0.503 (ns)		0.515 (ns)			0.519 (ns)
A–T	0.506 (ns)		0.488 (ns)		0.498 (ns)		0.503 (ns)
V–T		0.491 (ns)	0.528 (ns)			0.556*	0.506 (ns)

Crossmodal classifications were performed in the relevant unimodal and bimodal masks (e.g., audiovisual crossmodal classification was performed in the auditory, visual, and audiovisual masks), as well as in a trimodal mask. In general, crossmodal classification in the localizer‐based masks was indistinguishable from chance level. There was one exception: crossmodal classification of videos and touches was successful in the VT bimodal mask. Chance performance for all classifications is 0.5; the statistical significance of better‐than‐chance accuracy at the group level was assessed with one‐tailed t‐tests. *P < 0.05; ns, not significant.