Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 22;35(8):4016–4034. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22455

Table 2.

Brain areas showing stronger activation as a function of correct responses in the tennis anticipation conditions when contrasting the anticipation of tennis strokes with the ball‐bouncing control condition in all 32 participants

L/R X Y Z t value SUIT
Tennis anticipation > observation only (all 32 participants)
Cerebellum, crus II L −24 −88 −39 3.58
Cerebellum, lobule I–IV R 18 −40 −23 3.51
Cerebellum, lobule VIIIb L −22 −42 −51 3.43
Cerebellum, lobule VIIIa L −4 −68 −35 2.82
Cerebellum, lobule VIIb L −4 −68 −33 2.76
SPL (7PC) R 21 −73 64 3.27
SPL (5Ci) L −15 −34 46 2.76

MNI coordinates, P < 0.05, FWE‐corrected, ROI analysis, ROI masks thresholded at 50%.