Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 22;35(8):4016–4034. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22455

Table 3.

Brain areas identified by the between‐subject comparison of tennis experts and novices when contrasting the anticipation of tennis strokes with the ball‐bouncing control condition

L/R X Y Z t value SUIT
Tennis anticipation > observation only (experts > novices)
Cerebellum, crus I L −6 −74 −31 4.38
Cerebellum, crus II L −2 −78 −35 5.15
Cerebellum, crus II R 10 −80 −29 4,27
Cerebellum, lobule VIIb L −4 −74 −39 3.91
Cerebellum, lobule VIIIa R 4 −72 −43 3.91
Cerebellum, lobule VIIIb L −20 −40 −49 3.51
IFG (BA44) L −45 5 25 3.84
SPL (7P) L −30 −52 64 3.19
IPS (hlP1) L −36 −46 43 2.62
Tennis anticipation > observation only (novices > experts)

MNI coordinates, P < 0.05, FWE‐corrected, ROI analysis, ROI masks thresholded at 50%.