Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 8;36(2):603–618. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22650

Table 3.

Correlations between functional network measures and BOLD thalamo‐cortical functional connectivity, thalamic atrophy, and clinical cognitive measures

Thalamic volume BOLD thalamo‐cortical functional connectivity Average Cognition EDSS
Normalized clustering Delta 0.16 (0.15) −0.18 (0.10) 0.09 (0.40) 0.40 (<0.001)
Normalized clustering Theta 0.23 (0.03) 0.42 (<0.001) 0.13 (0.23) −0.17 (0.12)
Normalized clustering Alpha1 0.32 (0.003) −0.17 (0.13) 0.15 (0.19) 0.31 (0.004)
Normalized clustering Alpha2 0.42 (<0.001) −0.09 (0.42) 0.16 (0.14) 0.27 (0.01)
Normalized clustering Gamma 0.36 (0.001) 0.22 (0.05) 0.12 (0.28) −0.19 (0.08)
Normalized path length Theta 0.36 (0.001) 0.23 (0.04) 0.26 (0.02) −0.09 (0.40)
MST Leaf fraction Delta 0.09 (0.41) 0.24 (0.03) 0.12 (0.30) 0.40 (<0.001)
MST Leaf fraction Theta 0.33 (0.002) 0.31 (0.005) 0.22 (0.05) 0.30 (0.001)
MST Leaf fraction Alpha2 0.28 (0.01) 0.26 (0.02) 0.06 (0.56) −0.17 (0.13)
MST Diameter Theta −0.14 (0.21) 0.19 (0.1) −0.08 (0.46) 0.05 (0.65)
MST Degree divergence Delta 0.05 (0.67) −0.14 (0.23) 0.07 (0.54) 0.36 (0.001)
MST Degree divergence Theta 0.29 (0.007) 0.35 (0.001) 0.16 (0.14) 0.28 (0.01)
MST Degree divergence Alpha1 0.23 (0.04) 0.23 (0.04) 0.29 (0.007) 0.35 (0.001)
MST Degree divergence Alpha2 0.34 (0.002) 0.22 (0.05) 0.16 (0.15) −0.13 (0.23)

Values are reported as Spearman correlation values (P‐value) (step 2 of the analysis).

Bold, significant after correcting for multiple comparisons by the FDR. Italic, the result is not significant anymore after correction for multiple comparisons using the FDR (corrected for 4 × 14 tests) with FDR = p FDR *i/N. Here, p FDR = 0.05 (usual significance value in most statistical tests), i refers to the ranked index of the P‐values that are computed and N to the number of tests.